I have an alternate view on lung physiology that dismisses the notion of oxygen and carbon dioxide gaseous exchange
The article is titled
We breathe air not oxygen
I take you though all the steps that lead to this statement
Including how oxygen is manufactured
How oxygen is calibrated
Eg medical oxygen has 67parts per million of water contamination
Why oxygen is toxic, dehydrates and damages the alveoli
Lung physiology requires the air at the alveoli to reach 100% humidity
Can you see the problem?
The new take on lung physiology:
The lungs rehydrate the passing RBCs with iso tonic saline solution as they pass through the alveoli capillary beds
RBCs change from dark contracted dehydrated to plump bright hydrated form as they soak up the iso tonic saline solution the bursting alveoli bubbles throw upon the capillary sac
The airway mucosa conditions the breathe with salt and moisture
Very good information! Can you talk with anyone at Mayo to see how they administered and monitored their patients on Remdesivir? They might be happy to brag since they did so much better.😉
Great deep dive! I’m left with no questions. I do wonder if Artificial Intelligence docs will be more consistent from one doc to the other, but “one size fits all” could be even more pronounced then.
Coincidentally I was talking to my Dad about this while writing the article.
I think it will always take a person to treat another person, but there sure are areas where AI would be doing better. E.g. sieving through patient medication, taking enzyme kinetics into account, is a task most doctors have no competence for.
If the trend of medicine being practiced according to protocols continues, I think we will very soon be better off with machines doing the job. Right now, a lot of doctors just aren't practicing medicine anymore. A lot of GP's stopped touching their patients altogether throughout COVID. It's a disgrace.
True to the core. They also don't take their jobs seriously anymore, i know of 2 patients who have to ask the gp specific questions to get to his diagnosis, not the other way round.
I recall that Dr. Dmitry Kats has said that Remdesivir is really nothing more than a fake Niacin, with a fraction of the benefits and a thousand times the side effects of the real thing.
So I do think that the rates at which we are seeing these deaths involving the kidney are at least remarkable.
Supposedly Influenza A causes AKI in every third to every second patient as well. It's still a respiratory pathogen.
I'd like to see documented cases in which patients suffered no bacterial sepsis and did not receive at least 3 potentially nephrotoxic medications, either as treatment or in their daily regimen.
I have an alternate view on lung physiology that dismisses the notion of oxygen and carbon dioxide gaseous exchange
The article is titled
We breathe air not oxygen
I take you though all the steps that lead to this statement
Including how oxygen is manufactured
How oxygen is calibrated
Eg medical oxygen has 67parts per million of water contamination
Why oxygen is toxic, dehydrates and damages the alveoli
Lung physiology requires the air at the alveoli to reach 100% humidity
Can you see the problem?
The new take on lung physiology:
The lungs rehydrate the passing RBCs with iso tonic saline solution as they pass through the alveoli capillary beds
RBCs change from dark contracted dehydrated to plump bright hydrated form as they soak up the iso tonic saline solution the bursting alveoli bubbles throw upon the capillary sac
The airway mucosa conditions the breathe with salt and moisture
Find the article
Jane333.Substack.com
Well done.
Excellent work, I'm trying to get a hold of Bobby Bounds to the MN data, see what kind of dashboard I can make out of it.
Very good information! Can you talk with anyone at Mayo to see how they administered and monitored their patients on Remdesivir? They might be happy to brag since they did so much better.😉
They will not tell, because the rest of the other not so successful mediocre hospitals will not be so happy to be compared.
You just gave yourself away. I even included the email I wrote to Dr. Singbartl in the article. ;)
I’m sorry I missed it. I skim posts as I receive more than 400 emails a day and just can’t keep up with all the information.
I rarely read articles in full, so I totally understand and was just pointing out that I had already dispatched an email. ;)
Great deep dive! I’m left with no questions. I do wonder if Artificial Intelligence docs will be more consistent from one doc to the other, but “one size fits all” could be even more pronounced then.
Thank you.
Coincidentally I was talking to my Dad about this while writing the article.
I think it will always take a person to treat another person, but there sure are areas where AI would be doing better. E.g. sieving through patient medication, taking enzyme kinetics into account, is a task most doctors have no competence for.
If the trend of medicine being practiced according to protocols continues, I think we will very soon be better off with machines doing the job. Right now, a lot of doctors just aren't practicing medicine anymore. A lot of GP's stopped touching their patients altogether throughout COVID. It's a disgrace.
True to the core. They also don't take their jobs seriously anymore, i know of 2 patients who have to ask the gp specific questions to get to his diagnosis, not the other way round.
Precisely my last GP experience. I also had to help her out which diagnostics to perform (she couldn't decide between MRI and CT).
The only reason I see to visit a GP are cancer screenings or getting meds if one has to take any, which I fortunately don't.
Excellent article!
Thank you very much.
Great deep diving. For your new datasets, do you see correlation of terms like "Sepsis" or "Multiorgan Failure" with jabbing?
Write me an email to me@pervaers.com and I'll send you a CSV I prepared.
I was just waiting for you to make the first move. :D
Will prepare something.
There's a reason why the nurses called it "Run Death Is Near", after all.
Nm, I googled it. Remdesivir use no doubt bears a high risk of acute kidney injury, but I think it might be beneficial when used correctly.
I recall that Dr. Dmitry Kats has said that Remdesivir is really nothing more than a fake Niacin, with a fraction of the benefits and a thousand times the side effects of the real thing.
I don't get that. Can you explain?
“Isn’t it odd that a respiratory pathogen would be causing kidney injury?” COVID is a disease of the vascular system, so no it isn't odd.
Well, you do have a point, but it still infects the respiratory epithelium first and causes pneumonia.
Extrapulmonal manifestations are complications.
Extrapulmonal manifestations have become the exception since Omicron.
Admittedly, the phrasing wasn't ideal in that sentence, but I was kinda trying to express what went through my head at the time.
I still think you should find this odd: https://substack.com/profile/45049691-fabian-spieker/note/c-16288760
So I do think that the rates at which we are seeing these deaths involving the kidney are at least remarkable.
Supposedly Influenza A causes AKI in every third to every second patient as well. It's still a respiratory pathogen.
I'd like to see documented cases in which patients suffered no bacterial sepsis and did not receive at least 3 potentially nephrotoxic medications, either as treatment or in their daily regimen.