The only reason your work doesn't get more attention is that our movement is hijacked by gatekeepers controlling the narrative to keep the attention on members of their circle.
All this despite the fact that pregnant women had traditionally, out of love and human instinct and common sense, been protected by their husbands, extended family, and (at one time) by their doctors.
Well children are a huge market. I think that's plenty of reason for these people to push the vaccine.
For pregnant women the most plausible motive I can come up with is gathering safety data.
It's a rare opportunity, studying the effects of highly experimental gene therapeutics administered in pregnancy, without even paying the subjects.
Pfizer and Moderna receive all the data on adverse effects occurring in these patients.
It all happened around the same time though, around July 2021, when Delta became predominant. Vaccinations being advertised to young people, recommendations on pregnant and lactating women being changed, younger people dying in the US, pregnant women dying, the emergence of the term "pandemic of the unvaccinated".
Most of these things happened with a slight delay in Germany and weren't as pronounced, e.g. pregnant women didn't die, but covid related ICU visits among them increased.
I'll check how much Pfizer spent on those trials with 350 trial participants. Pretty sure it's north of 10k USD each, paid to the doctors administering the products and collecting the data.
It's macabre, but it's not unlikely that that's how these utilitarian maniacs think.
I think it is worse than gathering safety data. I think it is about population control. What better target than pregnant women and their babies to lower the population now and moving forward! They also want to give mRNA RSV to babies within hours (minutes?) of birth. They do not want to analysis any part of this safety data beforehand.
The healthiest times of my life were when I was pregnant. And I refused to take anything other than food, and was pretty careful about even that. No OTC meds, no prescription meds. (My remedy for a cold and stuffed head was to put my face over a bowl of eucalyptus leaves and steaming water, and alternate that with cold water.) If someone had suggested I needed to be injected with a substance to make me safer than I already felt I'd have laughed and told him to go to hell. So much seems to have changed since my pregnancies in the 1990s.
My friend's wife is pregnant with twins and they offered her a DTaP shot a few days ago.
The product has never been studied in pregnant women. I looked into the package insert and it explicitly states that. Only if absolutely necessary should it be administered during pregnancy (which is never).
Yet the doctors said it's safe.
The insert also said (in caps):
UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES MUST THE PRODUCT BE INJECTED INTRAVASALLY
Yet with the COVID shots, authorities explained that aspiration is not necessary...
I hope she refused that shot. Friends of ours nearly lost a pregnancy due to some liver disease in the third term. The disease wasn't pre-eclampsia, but from what could find online, it sounded like it involved platelets/white blood cells. The mother is a big believer in the COVID jabs and told us she had taken the primary series and would take every booster that came down the pike..and this while she was 5 months pregnant. In fact, though they are good friends and very kind, they kindly explained they couldn't see us until the baby was born because my husband and I aren't jabbed. Well, three months later, an emergency C-section saved the baby, who seems very healthy. But the mother is saying she isn't sure she can bear another child now. And most tragic, the baby is now 18 months old and just had his first COVID mRNA jab. I pray for them that this will not injure the boy.
Ugh... First experimental gene therapeutic at 18 months... Just sad.
I'm working on convincing her. Giving her all the data she needs.
4-9 annual tetanus cases in German hospitals vs. the stark warning in the package insert should be sufficient.
The Dad has already made up his mind and I'm optimistic we can convince her that it's just a really bad idea to provoke an immune reaction during pregnancy...
It really makes you wonder what these doctors know about human physiology...
The one bit of advice I kept hearing when I was pregnant was "when you're pregnant, your immune system is not as strong, and this is to protect the baby, so be careful". That gets drilled into pregnant women. Combine that with a galloping vaccine industry which is far more powerful now than in the 90s, and this manufactured COVID terror, and I do think the pressure from the CDC and ACOG to take the jabs resulted in real uptake.
By the way, your analysis is interesting. To correlate surges in death in pregnant women with the CDC's and ACOG diktats is a good workaround for the lack of data on jab rates in pregnant women. I've come to accept that death is the least error-prone diagnosis/outcome, though death from and with COVID is still fuzzy.
Yeah, for now U07.1 is just a diagnoses. I can't tell how exactly these people died, but correlations with U07.1 deaths are stronger than with any other type of mortality (I've literally run millions of regressions against various types of mortality, even on county level for those states for which I have death certificates).
Really what killed these pregnant women is the same thing that killed all the young people. But the timining of the recommendations suggest that the proportion of pregnant women among vaccinees should have been higher in Q3 than during the initial campaign.
When you look at the second chart, you can see how the proportion of pregnant women kept increasing pretty steadily, beginning in early 2021. When not having "U07.1 deaths" in the denominator this isn't apparent, since U07.1 deaths occurred in waves, so it gives off the impression that pregnant women only started dying in Q3. In reality their susceptibility saw more of a steady rise throughout the first half of the year though.
In the UK last year 1/3 of all births were to mothers not born in the UK. Why are the natives not giving birth? It's not a rhetorical question, nobody knows, spookier still, nobody is looking.
Hi Fabian. This is great work. And very disturbing. Can you drop me an email at marybethpf@aol.com? I'd like to talk for an upcoming article on this. Thanks for all you do.
Fabian, how can you separate out 2nd and third dose effects on mortality from your hypothesis and what about the known five month peak in deaths post last jab. I would say both of these may be visible in your charts too.
I noticed this trend in VAERS early on in the vaccination campaign relative to the number of vulnerable, elderly, etc. who had gone a year without catching or dying from COVID, but became sick and died from COVID following vaccination before the two weeks following the final shot were up. Ironically, these cases also drove the death tolls of the supposed “unvaccinated” and the CDC used that to continue to apply pressure around vaccination.
The trend was so obvious, to my layman’s eyes, that I told my husband that before and after he got vaccinated he needed to essentially quarantine to ensure that he did not get the actual virus while his body was dealing with the spike proteins from the injection.
Unlike a traditional vaccine, this shot actually subjected the individual and his/her immune system to a real pathogen. It stands to reason for those with weakened or vulnerable immune systems that the double whammy of spike proteins from the shot and virus could mean trouble. And based on the deaths I saw in VAERS and the profiles/descriptions it was apparent to me early on that one ought to use caution around vaccination at the very least in terms of potential exposure to COVID.
Unfortunately, my husband caved to the fear due to a co-worker of his being hospitalized and on a ventilator. I and my daughters remained unvaccinated based on my research and concerns particularly given my autoimmune history and medical background as an outlier. I was better equipped to contemplate or question the holes in the narrative and how they might impact my health. Whereas too many trusted that their best interests were protected by our regulatory agencies. Forever grateful I had the fortitude to stand my ground, but the trends I saw early on were far from reassuring that the vaccine was “safe and effective.” Thank you for your work and analysis.
Again, thanks for all you do, I appreciate you. Jump to minute 20 and listen a few if you don't have time but really entire thing is most excellent info!
The article was published June 18, 2021 and the data seem to end in May of that year. They give a graph showing uptake in a cohort of pregnant women according to race/ethnicity, identified in CDC's Vaccine Safety Datalink.
Their "implications for public health policy" statement is this:
"Improving outreach to and engagement with health care providers and pregnant women, especially those who are younger and from racial and ethnic minority groups, could increase vaccine confidence and thus coverage of COVID-19 vaccination in this population." It aligns with the timeline you show here.
The only reason your work doesn't get more attention is that our movement is hijacked by gatekeepers controlling the narrative to keep the attention on members of their circle.
It was so bizarre to watch all these narratives move into the exact opposite direction of where I seemed to find some truth.
It's hard to describe, but it didn't feel like it happened by chance
All this despite the fact that pregnant women had traditionally, out of love and human instinct and common sense, been protected by their husbands, extended family, and (at one time) by their doctors.
It begs the question: Why?
Indeed.
Yet it's still a taboo topic for wider public discussion -- despite the tactic, unavoidable recognition of the premeditation.
it also begs the question why regarding anyone under 18, esp babies??
nothing really made sense
Well children are a huge market. I think that's plenty of reason for these people to push the vaccine.
For pregnant women the most plausible motive I can come up with is gathering safety data.
It's a rare opportunity, studying the effects of highly experimental gene therapeutics administered in pregnancy, without even paying the subjects.
Pfizer and Moderna receive all the data on adverse effects occurring in these patients.
It all happened around the same time though, around July 2021, when Delta became predominant. Vaccinations being advertised to young people, recommendations on pregnant and lactating women being changed, younger people dying in the US, pregnant women dying, the emergence of the term "pandemic of the unvaccinated".
Most of these things happened with a slight delay in Germany and weren't as pronounced, e.g. pregnant women didn't die, but covid related ICU visits among them increased.
'For pregnant women the most plausible motive I can come up with is gathering safety data.' --> macabre at best...
Yeah, but probably not too far from the truth.
I'll check how much Pfizer spent on those trials with 350 trial participants. Pretty sure it's north of 10k USD each, paid to the doctors administering the products and collecting the data.
It's macabre, but it's not unlikely that that's how these utilitarian maniacs think.
I think it is worse than gathering safety data. I think it is about population control. What better target than pregnant women and their babies to lower the population now and moving forward! They also want to give mRNA RSV to babies within hours (minutes?) of birth. They do not want to analysis any part of this safety data beforehand.
absolutely. I wouldn't put anything past them.
but it still leaves me in awe, every time, when I come across it
The healthiest times of my life were when I was pregnant. And I refused to take anything other than food, and was pretty careful about even that. No OTC meds, no prescription meds. (My remedy for a cold and stuffed head was to put my face over a bowl of eucalyptus leaves and steaming water, and alternate that with cold water.) If someone had suggested I needed to be injected with a substance to make me safer than I already felt I'd have laughed and told him to go to hell. So much seems to have changed since my pregnancies in the 1990s.
Crazy isn't it?
My friend's wife is pregnant with twins and they offered her a DTaP shot a few days ago.
The product has never been studied in pregnant women. I looked into the package insert and it explicitly states that. Only if absolutely necessary should it be administered during pregnancy (which is never).
Yet the doctors said it's safe.
The insert also said (in caps):
UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES MUST THE PRODUCT BE INJECTED INTRAVASALLY
Yet with the COVID shots, authorities explained that aspiration is not necessary...
I hope she refused that shot. Friends of ours nearly lost a pregnancy due to some liver disease in the third term. The disease wasn't pre-eclampsia, but from what could find online, it sounded like it involved platelets/white blood cells. The mother is a big believer in the COVID jabs and told us she had taken the primary series and would take every booster that came down the pike..and this while she was 5 months pregnant. In fact, though they are good friends and very kind, they kindly explained they couldn't see us until the baby was born because my husband and I aren't jabbed. Well, three months later, an emergency C-section saved the baby, who seems very healthy. But the mother is saying she isn't sure she can bear another child now. And most tragic, the baby is now 18 months old and just had his first COVID mRNA jab. I pray for them that this will not injure the boy.
Ugh... First experimental gene therapeutic at 18 months... Just sad.
I'm working on convincing her. Giving her all the data she needs.
4-9 annual tetanus cases in German hospitals vs. the stark warning in the package insert should be sufficient.
The Dad has already made up his mind and I'm optimistic we can convince her that it's just a really bad idea to provoke an immune reaction during pregnancy...
It really makes you wonder what these doctors know about human physiology...
The one bit of advice I kept hearing when I was pregnant was "when you're pregnant, your immune system is not as strong, and this is to protect the baby, so be careful". That gets drilled into pregnant women. Combine that with a galloping vaccine industry which is far more powerful now than in the 90s, and this manufactured COVID terror, and I do think the pressure from the CDC and ACOG to take the jabs resulted in real uptake.
EXACTLY!
Plus, we always tell mothers how important it is that they're feeling well. "Everything affects the baby in your womb" is a typical phrase.
I really don't know what's gotten into people... Well we kinda do know I guess. It's just very impressive how quickly people forget.
By the way, your analysis is interesting. To correlate surges in death in pregnant women with the CDC's and ACOG diktats is a good workaround for the lack of data on jab rates in pregnant women. I've come to accept that death is the least error-prone diagnosis/outcome, though death from and with COVID is still fuzzy.
Yeah, for now U07.1 is just a diagnoses. I can't tell how exactly these people died, but correlations with U07.1 deaths are stronger than with any other type of mortality (I've literally run millions of regressions against various types of mortality, even on county level for those states for which I have death certificates).
Really what killed these pregnant women is the same thing that killed all the young people. But the timining of the recommendations suggest that the proportion of pregnant women among vaccinees should have been higher in Q3 than during the initial campaign.
When you look at the second chart, you can see how the proportion of pregnant women kept increasing pretty steadily, beginning in early 2021. When not having "U07.1 deaths" in the denominator this isn't apparent, since U07.1 deaths occurred in waves, so it gives off the impression that pregnant women only started dying in Q3. In reality their susceptibility saw more of a steady rise throughout the first half of the year though.
In the UK last year 1/3 of all births were to mothers not born in the UK. Why are the natives not giving birth? It's not a rhetorical question, nobody knows, spookier still, nobody is looking.
Hi Fabian. This is great work. And very disturbing. Can you drop me an email at marybethpf@aol.com? I'd like to talk for an upcoming article on this. Thanks for all you do.
Thank you. I will drop you a line.
Fabian, how can you separate out 2nd and third dose effects on mortality from your hypothesis and what about the known five month peak in deaths post last jab. I would say both of these may be visible in your charts too.
Great question!
This is discussed extensively in the main article: https://vigilance.pervaers.com/p/us-summer-deaths-of-2021
Search for: Time Shifts
I noticed this trend in VAERS early on in the vaccination campaign relative to the number of vulnerable, elderly, etc. who had gone a year without catching or dying from COVID, but became sick and died from COVID following vaccination before the two weeks following the final shot were up. Ironically, these cases also drove the death tolls of the supposed “unvaccinated” and the CDC used that to continue to apply pressure around vaccination.
The trend was so obvious, to my layman’s eyes, that I told my husband that before and after he got vaccinated he needed to essentially quarantine to ensure that he did not get the actual virus while his body was dealing with the spike proteins from the injection.
Unlike a traditional vaccine, this shot actually subjected the individual and his/her immune system to a real pathogen. It stands to reason for those with weakened or vulnerable immune systems that the double whammy of spike proteins from the shot and virus could mean trouble. And based on the deaths I saw in VAERS and the profiles/descriptions it was apparent to me early on that one ought to use caution around vaccination at the very least in terms of potential exposure to COVID.
Spot on Laura. I think safe for not getting the shot at all that was the best advice you could give to your husband.
Unfortunately, my husband caved to the fear due to a co-worker of his being hospitalized and on a ventilator. I and my daughters remained unvaccinated based on my research and concerns particularly given my autoimmune history and medical background as an outlier. I was better equipped to contemplate or question the holes in the narrative and how they might impact my health. Whereas too many trusted that their best interests were protected by our regulatory agencies. Forever grateful I had the fortitude to stand my ground, but the trends I saw early on were far from reassuring that the vaccine was “safe and effective.” Thank you for your work and analysis.
Geeee. Wonder what the date was when ACOG took the $8M. Murderers.
Oh yes, me too. Did they receive a donation from the industry?
Sorry, my mistake, it was a bit over $11M per FOIA according to Dr Thorp https://dailyclout.io/shocking-foia-results-11-million-to-bribe-ob-gyns-to-lie-to-moms-about-safety-of-mrna-vaccines/
Again, thanks for all you do, I appreciate you. Jump to minute 20 and listen a few if you don't have time but really entire thing is most excellent info!
Excellent, thank you.
Btw, I just found a signal for mast cell activation syndrome in VAERS.
PRR is 6.28593 (90% CI: 3.08699-12.79980)
But I'm not sure how long this LLT (MedDRA Lower Level Term) has been in existence. Older reports in the reference cohort might not include it.
Another brilliant analysis! Thanks for the great efforts. +1 on Mathew's comment.
Thank you, Tore! :)
Fabian, you must have seen this article:
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7024e2.htm
The article was published June 18, 2021 and the data seem to end in May of that year. They give a graph showing uptake in a cohort of pregnant women according to race/ethnicity, identified in CDC's Vaccine Safety Datalink.
Their "implications for public health policy" statement is this:
"Improving outreach to and engagement with health care providers and pregnant women, especially those who are younger and from racial and ethnic minority groups, could increase vaccine confidence and thus coverage of COVID-19 vaccination in this population." It aligns with the timeline you show here.
Excellent, great find, thank you.