In other news, China's "exit wave" after abandoning their insane Zero Covid policy seems to have finally peaked and crashed, and far less deadly than predicted. Of course, they shunned the mRNA jabs with the notable exceptions of Macau and Hong Kong, preferring their own homegrown inactivated whole virus vaccines instead, and fewer boo…
In other news, China's "exit wave" after abandoning their insane Zero Covid policy seems to have finally peaked and crashed, and far less deadly than predicted. Of course, they shunned the mRNA jabs with the notable exceptions of Macau and Hong Kong, preferring their own homegrown inactivated whole virus vaccines instead, and fewer boosters. So that is probably why it was far less disastrous. That, and they are probably still on BA.5 or XBB, before BQ or CH.
Check the examples in the Methods section if you are interested. They seem to have the only working vaccine lol. Or maybe they forge their data, but it looks pretty convincing.
Indeed. Cuba has their own protein subunit vaccine, with NO mRNA or transfection.
On a related note, Novavax (also a non-transfecting, non-mRNA protein subunit vaccine) in the West should have been the first out the gate, but the sycophantic lackeys for Pfizer and Moderna clearly had other plans.
Don't be so quick to celebrate Novavax without looking into how it's grown. The advertising sounded good but the techniques are just as dangerous. Adding to that, it's utilizing silk-producing insects, which were implicated in a previous biolab disease that also had ties to Texas.
Indeed. Why couldn't they have just used the nucleocapsid or the envelope protein instead of the spike? That would have held up against the variants better, and would have been far less toxic as well, provided that they used a non-toxic or less-toxic adjuvant such as perhaps beta-glucan or thymus peptides. Even plant-based saponins are still better than aluminum as far as adjuvants go.
And these are precisely the questions one asks when the ingredient lists and descriptions are mailed out to hospital staff at the very beginning of vax availability to say, hmm....... something funny is going on here.
Indeed, transfecting the genes of the spike is clearly worse in terms of half-life compared to simply injecting a finite amount of spike. The dose makes the poison, and an effectively infinite dose is worse than a finite dose.
Indeed, if it is "accidentally" injected into a vein or artery and it goes straight to the heart, that is clearly worse than if injected into a less-perfused part of a muscle.
You'll always injure vessels during an IM injection. It can't be avoided. Sometimes these are just capillaries, other times there are larger vessels among them. Expecting the injected liquid to "stay in the muscle" is plain absurd. I really wonder how a single doctor on this planet could ever fall for this blatant lie.
Check the examples in the Methods section if you are interested. They seem to have the only working vaccine. Or maybe they forge their data, but it looks pretty convincing.
As of 2022, Cuba had *10 higher excess deaths (485-550 per 100k) than 'official' COVID-19 deaths, higher than the USA (354-380 per 100k).
I'm leaning towards them forging the data.
It's interesting that Cuba had a lower % of citizens at risk than the USA (13.2% to 16.8% 65+), and what used to be considered a good Heath care system...
Btw, you compared Cuba to Finland. Finland had excess deaths of 218 per 100k, *1.7 of official COVID deaths, with a much older population (23.1% over 65).
Excess deaths indeed tell the final bill when all is said and done. I did not know that they did worse than the USA in terms of excess deaths. (Was that number cumulative?) That is pretty damning indeed for a country touted as a role model for the Global South.
Either their vaccines were not all they were cracked up to be in terms of safety, or effectiveness, or both.
Though the excess deaths may have also been a result of their lockdowns, the embargo, the panic, the isolation, the Foegen Effect from two years straight of mask mandates (!), and/or vaccinating a higher proportion of children compared to the rest of the world.
The more you know, the less Cuba glows. Not to say there aren't some good things about that country.
But in terms of current Covid numbers, if even close to the truth, still seems to bear out that NOT using mRNA jabs is the best way to end the pandemic sooner.
Could be, but I have to be suspicious of any data coming from the Chinese government. Especially if there is any chance that it could chance it could be an embarrassing...
In other news, China's "exit wave" after abandoning their insane Zero Covid policy seems to have finally peaked and crashed, and far less deadly than predicted. Of course, they shunned the mRNA jabs with the notable exceptions of Macau and Hong Kong, preferring their own homegrown inactivated whole virus vaccines instead, and fewer boosters. So that is probably why it was far less disastrous. That, and they are probably still on BA.5 or XBB, before BQ or CH.
Have you looked at the Cuban data?
https://vigilance.pervaers.com/p/boosters-are-prolonging-the-pandemic
Check the examples in the Methods section if you are interested. They seem to have the only working vaccine lol. Or maybe they forge their data, but it looks pretty convincing.
Indeed. Cuba has their own protein subunit vaccine, with NO mRNA or transfection.
On a related note, Novavax (also a non-transfecting, non-mRNA protein subunit vaccine) in the West should have been the first out the gate, but the sycophantic lackeys for Pfizer and Moderna clearly had other plans.
Don't be so quick to celebrate Novavax without looking into how it's grown. The advertising sounded good but the techniques are just as dangerous. Adding to that, it's utilizing silk-producing insects, which were implicated in a previous biolab disease that also had ties to Texas.
Yeah I didn't want to start a discussion since information is sparse, but it looks to me like Novavax is every bit as bad.
Ultimately it boils down to the question: Do you want to have a fully functional pathogenic viral protein circulating through your bloodstream?
https://www.pervaers.com/?v=NOV
6% with chest pain, 4% with palpitations... Haven't stratified for infection status though. These might all be reports with "breakthrough" infections.
Indeed. Why couldn't they have just used the nucleocapsid or the envelope protein instead of the spike? That would have held up against the variants better, and would have been far less toxic as well, provided that they used a non-toxic or less-toxic adjuvant such as perhaps beta-glucan or thymus peptides. Even plant-based saponins are still better than aluminum as far as adjuvants go.
I don't think the other structural proteins are exposed enough, but I'm not sure.
And these are precisely the questions one asks when the ingredient lists and descriptions are mailed out to hospital staff at the very beginning of vax availability to say, hmm....... something funny is going on here.
Indeed, I am pretty wary of Novavax too. The best one could say is it is perhaps a shade less bad than the gene therapy jabs.
Yeah I was exaggerating when I said "every bit as bad". It couldn't come close in terms of half-life.
Indeed, transfecting the genes of the spike is clearly worse in terms of half-life compared to simply injecting a finite amount of spike. The dose makes the poison, and an effectively infinite dose is worse than a finite dose.
Then again, dosis facit venenum. Sure the exposition time is shorter, but ultimately it depends on how Novavax is dosed.
Indeed, if it is "accidentally" injected into a vein or artery and it goes straight to the heart, that is clearly worse than if injected into a less-perfused part of a muscle.
You'll always injure vessels during an IM injection. It can't be avoided. Sometimes these are just capillaries, other times there are larger vessels among them. Expecting the injected liquid to "stay in the muscle" is plain absurd. I really wonder how a single doctor on this planet could ever fall for this blatant lie.
Very true.
Do you have any Data for Cuba?
https://vigilance.pervaers.com/p/boosters-are-prolonging-the-pandemic
Check the examples in the Methods section if you are interested. They seem to have the only working vaccine. Or maybe they forge their data, but it looks pretty convincing.
All based on OWID data.
And why do you recommend that we trust this data?
As of 2022, Cuba had *10 higher excess deaths (485-550 per 100k) than 'official' COVID-19 deaths, higher than the USA (354-380 per 100k).
I'm leaning towards them forging the data.
It's interesting that Cuba had a lower % of citizens at risk than the USA (13.2% to 16.8% 65+), and what used to be considered a good Heath care system...
Btw, you compared Cuba to Finland. Finland had excess deaths of 218 per 100k, *1.7 of official COVID deaths, with a much older population (23.1% over 65).
Excess deaths indeed tell the final bill when all is said and done. I did not know that they did worse than the USA in terms of excess deaths. (Was that number cumulative?) That is pretty damning indeed for a country touted as a role model for the Global South.
Either their vaccines were not all they were cracked up to be in terms of safety, or effectiveness, or both.
Though the excess deaths may have also been a result of their lockdowns, the embargo, the panic, the isolation, the Foegen Effect from two years straight of mask mandates (!), and/or vaccinating a higher proportion of children compared to the rest of the world.
The more you know, the less Cuba glows. Not to say there aren't some good things about that country.
But in terms of current Covid numbers, if even close to the truth, still seems to bear out that NOT using mRNA jabs is the best way to end the pandemic sooner.
Could be, but I have to be suspicious of any data coming from the Chinese government. Especially if there is any chance that it could chance it could be an embarrassing...