I just found an excellent article on Spike and heart - check out the electron microscope pictures of the virus particles swarming the heart cells (Figure 4). If you read very carefully how they have worded things, they showed the Spike alone (thus, what you get from vax) causes this damage. But in order to publish an article like this, these Mayo scientists can't come right out and make that statement (although that is also hinted at by the title). Another veiled hidden statement is that the Spike "somehow acquired" the sequences that cause the pathogenic behavior that they are observing - aka, biolab engineering.
Navaratnarajah et al. 2021. "Highly Efficient SARS-CoV-2 Infection of Human Cardiomyocytes: Spike Protein-Mediated Cell Fusion and Its Inhibition." doi: 10.1128/JVI.01368-21.
I hope you can read this, because I can't comment on any of your posts. You wrote about SARS-COV-2 associated lymphopenia. The NLR is one of the most reliable predictors for COVID death and I noticed something really interesting in the data:
Lymphopenia seems to precede neutrophilia by roughly 4 weeks. There's a large cross section of what we both invested energy into it seems. Great articles. So this maybe would strike you as odd as well: We know there's a lot of "trace" ethylene oxide amounts left in the porous nasal swabs. I am not an expert, but EO would strike me as an odd choice for porous materials. Especially when the evaporation interval is not continuously subjected to being controlled at random. It does deplete cellular Gluthatione very efficiently after all which is a huge risk for any cell that faces a virus intruder.
Oh, that's very interesting about the timing. Isn't lymphopenia also the canary-in-the-coalmine to monitor before agranulocytosis? (Thanks for your mutual interest in these topics and my posts - I have comments off because I wanted the voice of the publication authors to remain dominant.) The Transferrin articles are especially interesting for blood cells, because that right there can explain the cell levels dropping. I haven't finished working through what that means for iron metabolism; it also implicates Warburg / cancer. I haven't considered NLR.
Nasal swabs - right. I researched those at the beginning of the pandemic, and it raised red flags. Before covid, those swabs were used in biolabs as part of the assay itself: the fuzz on the swabs would be wrapped in nanoparticles in order to bond with target proteins, then swished in the vial of generic fluid. No information on the test packages tell us whether that is the case here. Prof. Gatti has recently been investigating them (google search). My post 'To the nose and beyond I' talks about how they are being aimed up at the Cribiform plate - essentially, brain access for whichever nanoparticles and whatever they may be carrying.
About the nasal swabs: I read your post and this is exactly what concerned me as well. My daughter told me they're taught to insert them vertically instead of horizontally and rub them right where the BBB has it's weakest point, which happens to be a potential target for np delivery. I stopped following this train of thought eventually, but first I had to think about the effects of the contaminants on cellular defenses.
If the gluthation depletion caused locally by the EO - even if just for minutes - bears any clinical significance and the unvaccinated are made to test themselves while the vaccinated children are not, then this might make their epithelium susceptible to whatever pathogens are flying through the class room.
I immediately taught my daughter how to fake the test when the insanity unfolded. <3
Alas, I am not a haematologist. Neither do I understand much about immunology. Both are very complex fields that require some degree of familiarity with the subject matter to interpret these peculiarities. I am not even an academic.
So while I do think the entire reaction of the body to the "vaccines" should include longitudinal haemtological investigations, my finding will remain another isolated eyebrow raiser for me.
I started plotting all the MedDRA terms occuring in VAERS as timeseries, but I am not sure if I will have the time to release any of it. It's really interesting. Here is a quick example. The chart is a disaster, but you get the idea:
I started stretching the charts to scale between 0 and 1 (not normalization) and then the idea is to cluster them into groups, but I am no data scientist or mathematician, so instead of using conventional similarity measures to get an idea of what would happen I wrote my own intuitive distance algorithm for the charts and grouped them into categories.
Naturally the curve of bell's palsy as one of the prime examples of a vaccine induced events interested me the most. The highest correlation in timecourse was found for these terms:
Depending on the algorithm I use, gout and ataxy also correlated with bell's palsy. I have to look at the graphs for a visual comparison to make more sense of it.
Bells Palsy and Loss of control of legs are interesting from a neurology department perspective, because there are a lot of sudden worsenings of preexisting conditions -- patients who are most vulnerable to these mechanisms to begin with --, which are not being investigated with consideration to linkage to the shot. Rather, the sudden symptoms are being considered as part of an ongoing disease process (MS, Parkinson's, etc.) Something common seems to be sudden incontinence. Which if you think about trying to live life decently, that really gouges dignity and creates huge care burdens. Even though their spine is being poked every so often, the Albumin quotient during CSF sampling is not being tested in patients with known chronic conditions because their diagnosis is already known. How's that for the patient: if their sudden incontinence were caused by vaccine-induced nerve damage such as GBS, they could immediately begin a strong course of treatment: this treatment is not included in the course of their ongoing MS or Parkinson's meds. That means that these patients may be at risk of chronic incontinence / chronic nerve damage that could otherwise have been addressed: the routine CSF was taken while delivering their intrathecal meds, the only difference is one additional checkbox on the lab test order form -- one checkbox, and potentially saved from a future of incontinence.
Blood values dropping is another common thing that is observable of course in hospital patients, but since hospital patients are ill, these values are being blamed on the ill patient rather than discussed as a wide trend with lower values across the board this year than last year. Doctors discuss each case individually, going through the standard diagnostic work-up, (could it be lyme?)...
None of the things suffered by patients with a known other condition makes it into VAERS. And it is patients with a known other condition who undergo the most tests and could provide a rich data source. They are also vulnerable.
Doctors: Test Albumin quotient in CSF, and consider that new-onset symptoms may not be entirely to blame on pre-existing conditions.
Well urinary incontinence you say hm? Interesting. There's something going on in the genitourinary tract, but I can't pinpoint it with just the VAERS data.
The month with the highest absolute amount of reports for that symptom is set to 100, resulting in linear rescaling of the charts for better visual comparability.
All these are only referring to mentions in breakthrough reports. You can see:
-There are two waves of breakthrough reports. One early on and a much larger one that begins in the 6th month.
- Kidney and urinary issues take up a larger proportion of reports in the "second wave". This could suggest some pathomechanism manifesting with delay. It could mean many things I suppose.
- I expect the reporting rate to decrease with increasing temporal distance to the vaccination. Yet the absolute number of reports for all these terms is much higher towards the end, with the most reports for polyuria coming in in the 12th month after a patient received dose 2
You can probably see more in it.
Acute kidney injury is highly prevalent among reports for SARS-COV-2-exposed individuals:
Reports of patients age 80+ not mentioning infection (+0.471% difference in proportions compared to pseudo-placebo report cohort):
Urinary incontence isn't very commonly reported, but kidney damage seems to be almost as common as coagulopathis and other cardiovascular events. I don't know these patients and I'm no doctor, but it would seem sensible to check their kidney function, especially if they had COVID-19.
It's also interesting that you mentioned neuropathies, since these follow a similar course but with another couple of months delay. Taking decreasing reporting rates into considerations I expect these symptoms to peak at 16 months post-vaccination.
A little while ago I disregarded most reports about people "dropping dead" as confirmation bias. It's getting very hard to ignore. I've got this feeling of dread that comes on every now and then when I let these things too close now. I think it would crush peoples' souls knowing what they were tricked into having injected.
I am just so glad I am not a clinician. I wouldn't know what to say to patients without giving my colleagues a very bad name. But well, I'd be out of a job anyway by now. No jab no job, right? Absolutely disgusting.
Oh and by the way, it seems the vaccine increases the NLR which might be one of the key mechanisms of disease enhancement.
I think there are different types of disease enhancement caused by these vaccines. One seems to be owed to the direct action of the spike protein. This is the main mechanism of disease enhancement.
Other aspects - MIS-C to name one of the very rare examples - can not be triggered by the vaccine alone.
And then there are a few side effects that are not aspects of the disease itself at all like Bell's palsy or Anaphylactic reactions. These are reactions to other components of the vaccines I think.
I love your new article. Haven't clicked any of the links yet, but absolutely loved the article itself. I thought more https://doi.org links instead of doi's would be nice, but that would've probably distracted me from reading.
Thank you! I have your new article open on a tab here to read this evening. It's been holiday preparation frenzy the last week so less computer. I've also been wanting to look at some articles related to the kidney chart you sent but had to wait on that to get gifts mailed out. (I will hop over to that comment to reply more).
If there is a war on the horizon, then those countries that have not deployed the modRNA vaccines will definitely have an edge over those that have in terms of their forces' cardiovascular health.
I think the countries in question are primarily China, Russia and some of their allies. The joke's on us.
Yes, believe so. We're deep into the matrix now. Ironically many are waking as the plot thickens. From the little I know Russia did use a dangerous vaccine. Their pregnancy statistics are miserable.
Russia used their own adenovirus vector jab, Sputnik V, which is almost as bad I think. China, on other hand, used only inactivated whole-virus vaccines. Excellent in Hong Kong, the only part of China where Pfizer was permitted, interestingly enough, where lots of foreigners and rebels live.
As I have tried to promote since early 2020 this is planetary. Some nations resisted in important ways and were more able to protect their citizens. Interesting international dynamics.
I just found an excellent article on Spike and heart - check out the electron microscope pictures of the virus particles swarming the heart cells (Figure 4). If you read very carefully how they have worded things, they showed the Spike alone (thus, what you get from vax) causes this damage. But in order to publish an article like this, these Mayo scientists can't come right out and make that statement (although that is also hinted at by the title). Another veiled hidden statement is that the Spike "somehow acquired" the sequences that cause the pathogenic behavior that they are observing - aka, biolab engineering.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8610601/
Navaratnarajah et al. 2021. "Highly Efficient SARS-CoV-2 Infection of Human Cardiomyocytes: Spike Protein-Mediated Cell Fusion and Its Inhibition." doi: 10.1128/JVI.01368-21.
I hope you can read this, because I can't comment on any of your posts. You wrote about SARS-COV-2 associated lymphopenia. The NLR is one of the most reliable predictors for COVID death and I noticed something really interesting in the data:
Lymphopenia seems to precede neutrophilia by roughly 4 weeks. There's a large cross section of what we both invested energy into it seems. Great articles. So this maybe would strike you as odd as well: We know there's a lot of "trace" ethylene oxide amounts left in the porous nasal swabs. I am not an expert, but EO would strike me as an odd choice for porous materials. Especially when the evaporation interval is not continuously subjected to being controlled at random. It does deplete cellular Gluthatione very efficiently after all which is a huge risk for any cell that faces a virus intruder.
Oh, that's very interesting about the timing. Isn't lymphopenia also the canary-in-the-coalmine to monitor before agranulocytosis? (Thanks for your mutual interest in these topics and my posts - I have comments off because I wanted the voice of the publication authors to remain dominant.) The Transferrin articles are especially interesting for blood cells, because that right there can explain the cell levels dropping. I haven't finished working through what that means for iron metabolism; it also implicates Warburg / cancer. I haven't considered NLR.
Nasal swabs - right. I researched those at the beginning of the pandemic, and it raised red flags. Before covid, those swabs were used in biolabs as part of the assay itself: the fuzz on the swabs would be wrapped in nanoparticles in order to bond with target proteins, then swished in the vial of generic fluid. No information on the test packages tell us whether that is the case here. Prof. Gatti has recently been investigating them (google search). My post 'To the nose and beyond I' talks about how they are being aimed up at the Cribiform plate - essentially, brain access for whichever nanoparticles and whatever they may be carrying.
About the nasal swabs: I read your post and this is exactly what concerned me as well. My daughter told me they're taught to insert them vertically instead of horizontally and rub them right where the BBB has it's weakest point, which happens to be a potential target for np delivery. I stopped following this train of thought eventually, but first I had to think about the effects of the contaminants on cellular defenses.
If the gluthation depletion caused locally by the EO - even if just for minutes - bears any clinical significance and the unvaccinated are made to test themselves while the vaccinated children are not, then this might make their epithelium susceptible to whatever pathogens are flying through the class room.
I immediately taught my daughter how to fake the test when the insanity unfolded. <3
Alas, I am not a haematologist. Neither do I understand much about immunology. Both are very complex fields that require some degree of familiarity with the subject matter to interpret these peculiarities. I am not even an academic.
So while I do think the entire reaction of the body to the "vaccines" should include longitudinal haemtological investigations, my finding will remain another isolated eyebrow raiser for me.
I started plotting all the MedDRA terms occuring in VAERS as timeseries, but I am not sure if I will have the time to release any of it. It's really interesting. Here is a quick example. The chart is a disaster, but you get the idea:
https://substack.pervaers.com/img/Influenza_vs_COVID.png
I started stretching the charts to scale between 0 and 1 (not normalization) and then the idea is to cluster them into groups, but I am no data scientist or mathematician, so instead of using conventional similarity measures to get an idea of what would happen I wrote my own intuitive distance algorithm for the charts and grouped them into categories.
Naturally the curve of bell's palsy as one of the prime examples of a vaccine induced events interested me the most. The highest correlation in timecourse was found for these terms:
Bell's palsy
Loss of control of legs
Oral mucosal exfoliation
Cerebral haemorrhage
Renal tubular necrosis
Lower respiratory tract infection
Epstein-Barr virus infection reactivation
Furuncle
Blood disorder
Brain operation
Increased bronchial secretion
Eyelid disorder
Right ventricular dilatation
Hypokalaemia
Mast cell activation syndrome
Stress
Hypertensive emergency
Transverse sinus thrombosis
Vasculitis
Obesity
Optic neuritis
Make of this what you will. ??
Depending on the algorithm I use, gout and ataxy also correlated with bell's palsy. I have to look at the graphs for a visual comparison to make more sense of it.
The idea was to reveal underlying pathodynamics.
Yikes.
Bells Palsy and Loss of control of legs are interesting from a neurology department perspective, because there are a lot of sudden worsenings of preexisting conditions -- patients who are most vulnerable to these mechanisms to begin with --, which are not being investigated with consideration to linkage to the shot. Rather, the sudden symptoms are being considered as part of an ongoing disease process (MS, Parkinson's, etc.) Something common seems to be sudden incontinence. Which if you think about trying to live life decently, that really gouges dignity and creates huge care burdens. Even though their spine is being poked every so often, the Albumin quotient during CSF sampling is not being tested in patients with known chronic conditions because their diagnosis is already known. How's that for the patient: if their sudden incontinence were caused by vaccine-induced nerve damage such as GBS, they could immediately begin a strong course of treatment: this treatment is not included in the course of their ongoing MS or Parkinson's meds. That means that these patients may be at risk of chronic incontinence / chronic nerve damage that could otherwise have been addressed: the routine CSF was taken while delivering their intrathecal meds, the only difference is one additional checkbox on the lab test order form -- one checkbox, and potentially saved from a future of incontinence.
Blood values dropping is another common thing that is observable of course in hospital patients, but since hospital patients are ill, these values are being blamed on the ill patient rather than discussed as a wide trend with lower values across the board this year than last year. Doctors discuss each case individually, going through the standard diagnostic work-up, (could it be lyme?)...
None of the things suffered by patients with a known other condition makes it into VAERS. And it is patients with a known other condition who undergo the most tests and could provide a rich data source. They are also vulnerable.
Doctors: Test Albumin quotient in CSF, and consider that new-onset symptoms may not be entirely to blame on pre-existing conditions.
Well urinary incontinence you say hm? Interesting. There's something going on in the genitourinary tract, but I can't pinpoint it with just the VAERS data.
I made a little graph for you: https://substack.pervaers.com/img/urinary.png
The month with the highest absolute amount of reports for that symptom is set to 100, resulting in linear rescaling of the charts for better visual comparability.
All these are only referring to mentions in breakthrough reports. You can see:
-There are two waves of breakthrough reports. One early on and a much larger one that begins in the 6th month.
- Kidney and urinary issues take up a larger proportion of reports in the "second wave". This could suggest some pathomechanism manifesting with delay. It could mean many things I suppose.
- I expect the reporting rate to decrease with increasing temporal distance to the vaccination. Yet the absolute number of reports for all these terms is much higher towards the end, with the most reports for polyuria coming in in the 12th month after a patient received dose 2
You can probably see more in it.
Acute kidney injury is highly prevalent among reports for SARS-COV-2-exposed individuals:
Reports of patients age 80+ not mentioning infection (+0.471% difference in proportions compared to pseudo-placebo report cohort):
https://www.pervaers.com/?v=CI0&q=acute_kidney_injury
Breakthrough reports in patients age 80+ (+3.569%)
https://www.pervaers.com/?v=CI1&q=acute_kidney_injury
Urinary incontence isn't very commonly reported, but kidney damage seems to be almost as common as coagulopathis and other cardiovascular events. I don't know these patients and I'm no doctor, but it would seem sensible to check their kidney function, especially if they had COVID-19.
It's also interesting that you mentioned neuropathies, since these follow a similar course but with another couple of months delay. Taking decreasing reporting rates into considerations I expect these symptoms to peak at 16 months post-vaccination.
A little while ago I disregarded most reports about people "dropping dead" as confirmation bias. It's getting very hard to ignore. I've got this feeling of dread that comes on every now and then when I let these things too close now. I think it would crush peoples' souls knowing what they were tricked into having injected.
I am just so glad I am not a clinician. I wouldn't know what to say to patients without giving my colleagues a very bad name. But well, I'd be out of a job anyway by now. No jab no job, right? Absolutely disgusting.
Oh and by the way, it seems the vaccine increases the NLR which might be one of the key mechanisms of disease enhancement.
I think there are different types of disease enhancement caused by these vaccines. One seems to be owed to the direct action of the spike protein. This is the main mechanism of disease enhancement.
Other aspects - MIS-C to name one of the very rare examples - can not be triggered by the vaccine alone.
And then there are a few side effects that are not aspects of the disease itself at all like Bell's palsy or Anaphylactic reactions. These are reactions to other components of the vaccines I think.
No cases of MIS-C observed without having the sickness? That's interesting.
Bell's arises from molecular mimicry, there are shared sequences with the nervous system.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7246018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7892316/
https://drjessesantiano.com/the-sars-cov-2-spike-protein-cross-reacts-with-eleven-human-proteins-to-cause-autoimmune-diseases/
I love your new article. Haven't clicked any of the links yet, but absolutely loved the article itself. I thought more https://doi.org links instead of doi's would be nice, but that would've probably distracted me from reading.
Thank you! I have your new article open on a tab here to read this evening. It's been holiday preparation frenzy the last week so less computer. I've also been wanting to look at some articles related to the kidney chart you sent but had to wait on that to get gifts mailed out. (I will hop over to that comment to reply more).
I correlated MIS-C, too, and it stands alone in it's time course. I can't find another MedDRA term that behaves similarly.
Thank you.
Good updates thanks. So our 12-17 year olds may be too compromised to fight their wars? Interesting but not unexpected.
I am very sorry to hear that.
If there is a war on the horizon, then those countries that have not deployed the modRNA vaccines will definitely have an edge over those that have in terms of their forces' cardiovascular health.
I think the countries in question are primarily China, Russia and some of their allies. The joke's on us.
Yes, believe so. We're deep into the matrix now. Ironically many are waking as the plot thickens. From the little I know Russia did use a dangerous vaccine. Their pregnancy statistics are miserable.
Russia used their own adenovirus vector jab, Sputnik V, which is almost as bad I think. China, on other hand, used only inactivated whole-virus vaccines. Excellent in Hong Kong, the only part of China where Pfizer was permitted, interestingly enough, where lots of foreigners and rebels live.
As I have tried to promote since early 2020 this is planetary. Some nations resisted in important ways and were more able to protect their citizens. Interesting international dynamics.
Hey, and don't forget about the Olympics. Who might have an interest there?