I just found an excellent article on Spike and heart - check out the electron microscope pictures of the virus particles swarming the heart cells (Figure 4). If you read very carefully how they have worded things, they showed the Spike alone (thus, what you get from vax) causes this damage. But in order to publish an article like this, these Mayo scientists can't come right out and make that statement (although that is also hinted at by the title). Another veiled hidden statement is that the Spike "somehow acquired" the sequences that cause the pathogenic behavior that they are observing - aka, biolab engineering.
Navaratnarajah et al. 2021. "Highly Efficient SARS-CoV-2 Infection of Human Cardiomyocytes: Spike Protein-Mediated Cell Fusion and Its Inhibition." doi: 10.1128/JVI.01368-21.
I hope you can read this, because I can't comment on any of your posts. You wrote about SARS-COV-2 associated lymphopenia. The NLR is one of the most reliable predictors for COVID death and I noticed something really interesting in the data:
Lymphopenia seems to precede neutrophilia by roughly 4 weeks. There's a large cross section of what we both invested energy into it seems. Great articles. So this maybe would strike you as odd as well: We know there's a lot of "trace" ethylene oxide amounts left in the porous nasal swabs. I am not an expert, but EO would strike me as an odd choice for porous materials. Especially when the evaporation interval is not continuously subjected to being controlled at random. It does deplete cellular Gluthatione very efficiently after all which is a huge risk for any cell that faces a virus intruder.
Oh, that's very interesting about the timing. Isn't lymphopenia also the canary-in-the-coalmine to monitor before agranulocytosis? (Thanks for your mutual interest in these topics and my posts - I have comments off because I wanted the voice of the publication authors to remain dominant.) The Transferrin articles are especially interesting for blood cells, because that right there can explain the cell levels dropping. I haven't finished working through what that means for iron metabolism; it also implicates Warburg / cancer. I haven't considered NLR.
Nasal swabs - right. I researched those at the beginning of the pandemic, and it raised red flags. Before covid, those swabs were used in biolabs as part of the assay itself: the fuzz on the swabs would be wrapped in nanoparticles in order to bond with target proteins, then swished in the vial of generic fluid. No information on the test packages tell us whether that is the case here. Prof. Gatti has recently been investigating them (google search). My post 'To the nose and beyond I' talks about how they are being aimed up at the Cribiform plate - essentially, brain access for whichever nanoparticles and whatever they may be carrying.
About the nasal swabs: I read your post and this is exactly what concerned me as well. My daughter told me they're taught to insert them vertically instead of horizontally and rub them right where the BBB has it's weakest point, which happens to be a potential target for np delivery. I stopped following this train of thought eventually, but first I had to think about the effects of the contaminants on cellular defenses.
If the gluthation depletion caused locally by the EO - even if just for minutes - bears any clinical significance and the unvaccinated are made to test themselves while the vaccinated children are not, then this might make their epithelium susceptible to whatever pathogens are flying through the class room.
I immediately taught my daughter how to fake the test when the insanity unfolded. <3
Alas, I am not a haematologist. Neither do I understand much about immunology. Both are very complex fields that require some degree of familiarity with the subject matter to interpret these peculiarities. I am not even an academic.
So while I do think the entire reaction of the body to the "vaccines" should include longitudinal haemtological investigations, my finding will remain another isolated eyebrow raiser for me.
I started plotting all the MedDRA terms occuring in VAERS as timeseries, but I am not sure if I will have the time to release any of it. It's really interesting. Here is a quick example. The chart is a disaster, but you get the idea:
I started stretching the charts to scale between 0 and 1 (not normalization) and then the idea is to cluster them into groups, but I am no data scientist or mathematician, so instead of using conventional similarity measures to get an idea of what would happen I wrote my own intuitive distance algorithm for the charts and grouped them into categories.
Naturally the curve of bell's palsy as one of the prime examples of a vaccine induced events interested me the most. The highest correlation in timecourse was found for these terms:
Depending on the algorithm I use, gout and ataxy also correlated with bell's palsy. I have to look at the graphs for a visual comparison to make more sense of it.
Oh and by the way, it seems the vaccine increases the NLR which might be one of the key mechanisms of disease enhancement.
I think there are different types of disease enhancement caused by these vaccines. One seems to be owed to the direct action of the spike protein. This is the main mechanism of disease enhancement.
Other aspects - MIS-C to name one of the very rare examples - can not be triggered by the vaccine alone.
And then there are a few side effects that are not aspects of the disease itself at all like Bell's palsy or Anaphylactic reactions. These are reactions to other components of the vaccines I think.
I love your new article. Haven't clicked any of the links yet, but absolutely loved the article itself. I thought more https://doi.org links instead of doi's would be nice, but that would've probably distracted me from reading.
Thank you! I have your new article open on a tab here to read this evening. It's been holiday preparation frenzy the last week so less computer. I've also been wanting to look at some articles related to the kidney chart you sent but had to wait on that to get gifts mailed out. (I will hop over to that comment to reply more).
If there is a war on the horizon, then those countries that have not deployed the modRNA vaccines will definitely have an edge over those that have in terms of their forces' cardiovascular health.
I think the countries in question are primarily China, Russia and some of their allies. The joke's on us.
Yes, believe so. We're deep into the matrix now. Ironically many are waking as the plot thickens. From the little I know Russia did use a dangerous vaccine. Their pregnancy statistics are miserable.
Russia used their own adenovirus vector jab, Sputnik V, which is almost as bad I think. China, on other hand, used only inactivated whole-virus vaccines. Excellent in Hong Kong, the only part of China where Pfizer was permitted, interestingly enough, where lots of foreigners and rebels live.
As I have tried to promote since early 2020 this is planetary. Some nations resisted in important ways and were more able to protect their citizens. Interesting international dynamics.
I just found an excellent article on Spike and heart - check out the electron microscope pictures of the virus particles swarming the heart cells (Figure 4). If you read very carefully how they have worded things, they showed the Spike alone (thus, what you get from vax) causes this damage. But in order to publish an article like this, these Mayo scientists can't come right out and make that statement (although that is also hinted at by the title). Another veiled hidden statement is that the Spike "somehow acquired" the sequences that cause the pathogenic behavior that they are observing - aka, biolab engineering.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8610601/
Navaratnarajah et al. 2021. "Highly Efficient SARS-CoV-2 Infection of Human Cardiomyocytes: Spike Protein-Mediated Cell Fusion and Its Inhibition." doi: 10.1128/JVI.01368-21.
I hope you can read this, because I can't comment on any of your posts. You wrote about SARS-COV-2 associated lymphopenia. The NLR is one of the most reliable predictors for COVID death and I noticed something really interesting in the data:
Lymphopenia seems to precede neutrophilia by roughly 4 weeks. There's a large cross section of what we both invested energy into it seems. Great articles. So this maybe would strike you as odd as well: We know there's a lot of "trace" ethylene oxide amounts left in the porous nasal swabs. I am not an expert, but EO would strike me as an odd choice for porous materials. Especially when the evaporation interval is not continuously subjected to being controlled at random. It does deplete cellular Gluthatione very efficiently after all which is a huge risk for any cell that faces a virus intruder.
Oh, that's very interesting about the timing. Isn't lymphopenia also the canary-in-the-coalmine to monitor before agranulocytosis? (Thanks for your mutual interest in these topics and my posts - I have comments off because I wanted the voice of the publication authors to remain dominant.) The Transferrin articles are especially interesting for blood cells, because that right there can explain the cell levels dropping. I haven't finished working through what that means for iron metabolism; it also implicates Warburg / cancer. I haven't considered NLR.
Nasal swabs - right. I researched those at the beginning of the pandemic, and it raised red flags. Before covid, those swabs were used in biolabs as part of the assay itself: the fuzz on the swabs would be wrapped in nanoparticles in order to bond with target proteins, then swished in the vial of generic fluid. No information on the test packages tell us whether that is the case here. Prof. Gatti has recently been investigating them (google search). My post 'To the nose and beyond I' talks about how they are being aimed up at the Cribiform plate - essentially, brain access for whichever nanoparticles and whatever they may be carrying.
About the nasal swabs: I read your post and this is exactly what concerned me as well. My daughter told me they're taught to insert them vertically instead of horizontally and rub them right where the BBB has it's weakest point, which happens to be a potential target for np delivery. I stopped following this train of thought eventually, but first I had to think about the effects of the contaminants on cellular defenses.
If the gluthation depletion caused locally by the EO - even if just for minutes - bears any clinical significance and the unvaccinated are made to test themselves while the vaccinated children are not, then this might make their epithelium susceptible to whatever pathogens are flying through the class room.
I immediately taught my daughter how to fake the test when the insanity unfolded. <3
Alas, I am not a haematologist. Neither do I understand much about immunology. Both are very complex fields that require some degree of familiarity with the subject matter to interpret these peculiarities. I am not even an academic.
So while I do think the entire reaction of the body to the "vaccines" should include longitudinal haemtological investigations, my finding will remain another isolated eyebrow raiser for me.
I started plotting all the MedDRA terms occuring in VAERS as timeseries, but I am not sure if I will have the time to release any of it. It's really interesting. Here is a quick example. The chart is a disaster, but you get the idea:
https://substack.pervaers.com/img/Influenza_vs_COVID.png
I started stretching the charts to scale between 0 and 1 (not normalization) and then the idea is to cluster them into groups, but I am no data scientist or mathematician, so instead of using conventional similarity measures to get an idea of what would happen I wrote my own intuitive distance algorithm for the charts and grouped them into categories.
Naturally the curve of bell's palsy as one of the prime examples of a vaccine induced events interested me the most. The highest correlation in timecourse was found for these terms:
Bell's palsy
Loss of control of legs
Oral mucosal exfoliation
Cerebral haemorrhage
Renal tubular necrosis
Lower respiratory tract infection
Epstein-Barr virus infection reactivation
Furuncle
Blood disorder
Brain operation
Increased bronchial secretion
Eyelid disorder
Right ventricular dilatation
Hypokalaemia
Mast cell activation syndrome
Stress
Hypertensive emergency
Transverse sinus thrombosis
Vasculitis
Obesity
Optic neuritis
Make of this what you will. ??
Depending on the algorithm I use, gout and ataxy also correlated with bell's palsy. I have to look at the graphs for a visual comparison to make more sense of it.
The idea was to reveal underlying pathodynamics.
Oh and by the way, it seems the vaccine increases the NLR which might be one of the key mechanisms of disease enhancement.
I think there are different types of disease enhancement caused by these vaccines. One seems to be owed to the direct action of the spike protein. This is the main mechanism of disease enhancement.
Other aspects - MIS-C to name one of the very rare examples - can not be triggered by the vaccine alone.
And then there are a few side effects that are not aspects of the disease itself at all like Bell's palsy or Anaphylactic reactions. These are reactions to other components of the vaccines I think.
No cases of MIS-C observed without having the sickness? That's interesting.
Bell's arises from molecular mimicry, there are shared sequences with the nervous system.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7246018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7892316/
https://drjessesantiano.com/the-sars-cov-2-spike-protein-cross-reacts-with-eleven-human-proteins-to-cause-autoimmune-diseases/
I love your new article. Haven't clicked any of the links yet, but absolutely loved the article itself. I thought more https://doi.org links instead of doi's would be nice, but that would've probably distracted me from reading.
Thank you! I have your new article open on a tab here to read this evening. It's been holiday preparation frenzy the last week so less computer. I've also been wanting to look at some articles related to the kidney chart you sent but had to wait on that to get gifts mailed out. (I will hop over to that comment to reply more).
I correlated MIS-C, too, and it stands alone in it's time course. I can't find another MedDRA term that behaves similarly.
Thank you.
Good updates thanks. So our 12-17 year olds may be too compromised to fight their wars? Interesting but not unexpected.
I am very sorry to hear that.
If there is a war on the horizon, then those countries that have not deployed the modRNA vaccines will definitely have an edge over those that have in terms of their forces' cardiovascular health.
I think the countries in question are primarily China, Russia and some of their allies. The joke's on us.
Yes, believe so. We're deep into the matrix now. Ironically many are waking as the plot thickens. From the little I know Russia did use a dangerous vaccine. Their pregnancy statistics are miserable.
Russia used their own adenovirus vector jab, Sputnik V, which is almost as bad I think. China, on other hand, used only inactivated whole-virus vaccines. Excellent in Hong Kong, the only part of China where Pfizer was permitted, interestingly enough, where lots of foreigners and rebels live.
As I have tried to promote since early 2020 this is planetary. Some nations resisted in important ways and were more able to protect their citizens. Interesting international dynamics.
Hey, and don't forget about the Olympics. Who might have an interest there?