I am glad you recommend talking to God. Good will prevail over evil because God is in control. I personally don't believe that whoever started this had good intentions. I do believe God used the situation to wake up a lot of people.
It's quite an abrupt change in tone from your previous, very informative, data-driven articles. On top of my own experience of witnessing an unmistakable contagion pattern, there are extremely well sourced and well documented monographs showing 1) a lab leak, somewhere in 2019, and 2) a concerted effort to test a very dangerous military countermeasure on a planetary scale. I assume you have evidence of "acute eosinophilic pneumonia" caused by a combination of toxins and radiation.
Enlightened thinking tends to be superficial thinking because its critical armory is deployed against every faith except its own blind faith in the power of reason. [Raymond] Aron avoided the besetting liability of the Enlightenment by subjecting its ideals to the same scrutiny it reserved for its adversaries. "In defending the freedom of religious teaching," he wrote, "the unbeliever defends his own freedom." Aron's generosity of spirit was a coefficient of his recognition that reality was complex, knowledge limited, and action essential. Aron, Shils wrote, "very early came to know the sterile vanity of moral denunciations and lofty proclamations, of demands for perfection and of the assessment of existing situations according to the standard of perfection." As Aron himself wrote in *Opium* [of the Intellectuals], "every known regime is blameworthy if one relates it to an abstract ideal of equality or liberty."
THE LEITMOTIF of Aron's career was responsibility. Not the whining metaphysical or "ontological" responsibility that Sartre was always going on about—the anguished "responsibility of the for-itself" burdened by groundless freedom--but the exercise of that prosaic, but indispensable, virtue: prudence. Aron understood that political wisdom rests in the ability to choose the better course of action even when the best course is unavailable--which is always. "The last word," he insisted, "is never said and one must not judge one's adversaries as if one's own cause were identified with absolute truth."
Roger Kimball, *LIVES OF THE MIND*, Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 2002, p. 8.
I am glad you recommend talking to God. Good will prevail over evil because God is in control. I personally don't believe that whoever started this had good intentions. I do believe God used the situation to wake up a lot of people.
Have you looked at your blood under a microscope?
Two fraudulent articles in Lancet should be retracted immediately https://triglavmedia.si/mnenja/komentarji/1070-retraction-request-of-lancet-mathematical-statistical-fraud-in-2022-2024
It's quite an abrupt change in tone from your previous, very informative, data-driven articles. On top of my own experience of witnessing an unmistakable contagion pattern, there are extremely well sourced and well documented monographs showing 1) a lab leak, somewhere in 2019, and 2) a concerted effort to test a very dangerous military countermeasure on a planetary scale. I assume you have evidence of "acute eosinophilic pneumonia" caused by a combination of toxins and radiation.
The future has, indeed, already begun . . . .
Just consider the apocalypse now unfolding in China:
> https://workflowy.com/s/beyond-covid-19/SoQPdY75WJteLUYx#/f58ab17f6292
Quoting:
Enlightened thinking tends to be superficial thinking because its critical armory is deployed against every faith except its own blind faith in the power of reason. [Raymond] Aron avoided the besetting liability of the Enlightenment by subjecting its ideals to the same scrutiny it reserved for its adversaries. "In defending the freedom of religious teaching," he wrote, "the unbeliever defends his own freedom." Aron's generosity of spirit was a coefficient of his recognition that reality was complex, knowledge limited, and action essential. Aron, Shils wrote, "very early came to know the sterile vanity of moral denunciations and lofty proclamations, of demands for perfection and of the assessment of existing situations according to the standard of perfection." As Aron himself wrote in *Opium* [of the Intellectuals], "every known regime is blameworthy if one relates it to an abstract ideal of equality or liberty."
THE LEITMOTIF of Aron's career was responsibility. Not the whining metaphysical or "ontological" responsibility that Sartre was always going on about—the anguished "responsibility of the for-itself" burdened by groundless freedom--but the exercise of that prosaic, but indispensable, virtue: prudence. Aron understood that political wisdom rests in the ability to choose the better course of action even when the best course is unavailable--which is always. "The last word," he insisted, "is never said and one must not judge one's adversaries as if one's own cause were identified with absolute truth."
Roger Kimball, *LIVES OF THE MIND*, Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 2002, p. 8.