Nov 7, 2023·edited Nov 13, 2023Liked by Fabian Spieker
I think fertility could be the main thing, wouldn't be surprised if the bulk of the 32,089 reports never published are that (reports missing in the VAERS_ID sequence).
"It's the fertility" is my theory right now but might only pan out with more time.
Amazing the correlation! Thanks for digging this analysis out of the data.
Yeah 0.96 is just insane. Controlling for first dose coverage does nothing. p>0.3
Sinister! Something for Naomi Klein perhaps (our one as opposed to the no logo one)
I think fertility could be the main thing, wouldn't be surprised if the bulk of the 32,089 reports never published are that (reports missing in the VAERS_ID sequence).
"It's the fertility" is my theory right now but might only pan out with more time.
Here's the count of each of 248 symptom entries matching a regex of baby and female fertility terms, count total only ~60K. https://univaers.com/download/special/vaers_symptoms_female_fertility_and_baby.xlsx
Looks something like ...
count vaers_symptom_entry
60,151 Total
16308 Heavy menstrual bleeding
9638 Menstruation irregular
7777 Menstrual disorder
4998 Menstruation delayed
4426 Exposure during pregnancy
4368 Maternal exposure during pregnancy
4342 Intermenstrual bleeding
1008 Maternal exposure during breast feeding
883 Premenstrual syndrome
577 Maternal exposure before pregnancy
400 Pregnancy
392 Maternal exposure timing unspecified
392 Foetal death
......
That's a subset of all symptom entry counts I published yesterday where it turned up [EDIT: 18%, page updated] of jabbed have covid, surprised me: https://deepdots.substack.com/p/vaers-symptoms-entry-counts
Yeah. This doesn’t sit well with the narrative of safe and effective. Also- these unborn babies were likely a causality of this war.
Disgusting.
Thank you for this stack.