One of the main reasons I paused posting on my blog is my embarrassment with the sphere I found myself in, including the insane authors, dishonesty and more. I felt like the truth was drowning in the torrent of lying, attention-seeking, and money-grift.
Oh Mike, Mikey, old chap, I am so happy to see you here.
I thought I'd never hear from you again, after I told you yesterday, that you are going to pay for helping to cover up 30 million murders.
This was right after you told me: There are no viruses, actually addressing me with my first name.
It was right before you deleted our entire chat.
You know, I keep backups of Telegram chats, Mike. You've known me since 2021. You've seen my picture every week throughout 2025, in the same chat window as the messages you exchanged with me.
Saying you don't who I am was really dumb. And honestly: I really didn't think you were THAT stupid.
You can't lie your cowardly ass out of this. You have blood on your hands. The blood of 30 million innocent people, you dirty motherfucker.
Funny huh? You'd think he'd be busy clearing up these 30 million murders, but apparently he has more important stuff on his plate now. Like counting dollar bills maybe.
I was hoping it would become clear just by reading this article. If you want the detailed version you'll either have to be patient or write me a pm so I can explain in more detail in a call.
If you can wait or don't want to hear the long version in a call, I'll just say this:
There have been a little over 25mio excess deaths between 2020 and 2023.
Only 5 million are explained by the mysterious infectious disease COVID-19, if you understand it as such, but we don't have the faintest clue where this virus suddenly came from, so even those 5 million deaths are waiting to be explained - if you understand that pandemics don't just "pop up out of nowhere".
Almost the entire "resistance movement" has been lead to believe, the assessment of Prof. Rancourt was reliable. Mike was one of the loudest voices in that respect. Rancourt supplies an explanation for 17 out of those 20 million excess deaths. Once you realize that these claims are not only unfounded, but that highly influential background actors are pumping money into this narrative, you won't be able to avoid asking yourself:
What are they hiding?
I informed Mike about Rancourt's deception 4 months ago. Have you seen him correct his mistakes?
There is more about Mike that is deeply unsettling, in terms of his finances and who he's offered money to in the past, but I am not gonna go down that road. He's full of shit and I'll repeat that in front of any judge if I have to, but that's all people really need to know.
I just want to sensitize vaccine critics - which I still belong to - to the explanatory gap this revelation leaves behind, so we can focus on understanding what really happened and on the legal battles that lie ahead of us. And there will be plenty of those.
You fanboys are never gonna listen to facts or cold logic, so I won't waste my time on explaining to you how criticizing him for covering up the cause of 30 mio. deaths is not an ad hominem attack and neither is calling him a dirty motherfucker for it.
Calling you fanboy - which you are - THAT is an ad hominem attack. So fuck off, fanboy.
> I recall seeing graphs like this in the first paper of theirs I reviewed, the one that looked at EM in 17 Southern Hemisphere and tropical countries. I assume the context for the above graph is similar. The central hypothesis of Rancourt et al in all these papers is that *all* post-rollout EM is due to the vaccines. Their argument for this mostly centers around purported temporal correlations between rates of vax uptake and rates of EM. In the paper I reviewed, graphs like this one were made in order to estimate the "dose fatality rate" *assuming* their central hypothesis was true, rather than as evidence in and of themselves *for* this hypothesis. Hence, it's not the same situation as with Allen's paper. Admittedly, I recall that when I first read their paper, it took me a while to realize they weren't claiming such graphs were themselves part of the evidence *for* their hypothesis, and that they could have been much clearer.
Rancourt's Figure 52 was included in a section titled "Calculated risk of death per injection from COVID-19 vaccines", where the authors calculated a global vDFR value as a median of the vDFR values in various countries. So perhaps the purpose of Figure 52 was to demonstrate how much variation there was in vDFR between countries, or which countries were outliers in terms of vDFR.
However Rancourt et al. also wrote: "For all the time periods in Figure 52 (and Figure 53), the correlations are generally strong (r ≥ 0.60) or very strong (r ≥ 0.80), and the intercepts are zero within error, which implies proportionality. The excess all-cause mortality in these time periods is proportional to the number of COVID-19 vaccine injections given." But they didn't make it clear enough that the high correlation was due to a lack of adjustment for population size.
Rancourt derived his figure of 17 million vaccine deaths by assuming that all excess deaths after the vaccine rollout were due to the vaccines. People still promote his figure, even though in a paper he published last December, he now said that there were not necessarily too many deaths that were directly caused by vaccines, which is incompatible with his earlier assumption that all excess deaths were due to the vaccines. In the paper he wrote the following (https://correlation-canada.org/respiratory-epidemics-without-viral-transmission/):
> In the high-quality databases for the USA, there is a close match between the weekly reported COVID-19 mortality and weekly excess all-cause mortality, in the Covid period (2020-2022), including prior to and during the vaccine rollouts (CDC, 2023).
> To the degree that COVID-19 death assignation represents a serious respiratory condition at death, and given the intricate weekly temporal matching of the reported COVID-19 mortality and excess all-cause mortality for up to 3 years in the USA data, this represents strong evidence that respiratory infections were dominantly (virtually entirely) associated with the excess all-cause mortality.
> [...]
> Recently, Rancourt et al. (in preparation) analysed national mortality data in one country in which COVID-19 vaccination status was known at death, including the history of COVID-19 vaccinations, in a case in which the country exhibited rapid vaccine rollouts strongly temporally associated with observed surges in excess all-cause mortality. They found that relevant peaks in excess all-cause mortality associated with booster rollouts could not preferentially be assigned to booster-vaccinated individuals (and also that the vaccine had no detectable survival benefit).
> This means that the COVID-19 vaccination primary cause described in Section 3.3.5 did not produce a measurable increase in excess all-cause mortality in this country, which in turn means that sharp peaks in excess all-cause mortality which are temporally associated with rapid vaccine rollouts need not imply that COVID-19 vaccination is a primary cause of death. Rather, it seems that (as pervasive as they are) such temporal associations between mortality peaks and rapid vaccine rollouts are due to the primary cause described in Section 3.3.6 of campaigns and measures associated in time and place with COVID-19 vaccine rollouts. Although non-conclusive in general, this is consistent with the fact that the vaccine toxicity causing death inferred from populationwide adverse-effect monitoring is usually too small to be detected directly in populationwide (e.g., national) cause-independent all-cause mortality, as per analyses of USA VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System) data (Hickey and Rancourt, 2022).
> This would mean that the lethality of medical measures imposed during the Covid period and during vaccine rollouts is much greater than generally acknowledged, and much greater than the known (VAERS, autopsies, etc.) vaccine toxicity itself.
After I pointed out to Rancourt that his new view seems to have been incompatible with his earlier estimate of 17 million vaccine deaths, he published a Substack post where he said that his figure of 17 million still stands, but there were rather millions people who were killed indirectly by measures associated with vaccination, like "more aggressive or extreme immobilization and isolation enforcement during the vaccine rollout", "psychological stress of being coerced into re-vaccination", "disrupted patient care schedule", or "transmitted stress of the attendants": https://sars2.net/nopandemic.html#Figure_of_17_million_vaccine_deaths_in_view_of_Rancourts_later_opinion_about_excess_deaths_in_2024. It seemed like he was jumping through hoops to try to reconcile his conflicting statements.
When Rancourt wrote about "national mortality data in one country in which COVID-19 vaccination status was known at death", I think he was talking about the Czech record-level data. I offered to help him review his manuscript in case he meant the Czech dataset, because I'm probably the world's leading expert on the Czech data, but he didn't reply to me.
In the Czech Republic, the rollout of the first booster dose roughly coincided with a spike in deaths in November to December 2021 if you look at all ages aggregated together. But if you split out the data by age group, the deaths peaked about a month after the booster rollout in ages 80+ but about a month before the booster rollout in ages 40-59: https://sars2.net/czech.html#Daily_deaths_and_vaccine_doses_by_age_group.
Age-stratified data exposes a major weakness in Rancourt's approach of temporally correlating spikes in deaths with periods when a new vaccine dose was rolled out. Rancourt's southern-hemisphere paper also included age-startified plots for Chile and Peru, which showed date on the x-axis and deaths and new vaccine doses on the y-axis. You could easily see that the deaths peaked around the same time in all age groups, even though new vaccine doses were rolled out earlier to older age groups and later to younger age groups.
"When Rancourt wrote about "national mortality data in one country in which COVID-19 vaccination status was known at death", I think he was talking about the Czech record-level data. I offered to help him review his manuscript in case he meant the Czech dataset, because I'm probably the world's leading expert on the Czech data, but he didn't reply to me."
Exactly. I tried contacting both him and Steve Kirsch for an eternity.
Neither ever reacted. We are out of their league in terms of moral integrity. They can't control us and they know it, so their job is to steer clear of us, unless told otherwise.
Russ Wolfinger was told otherwise sometime in 2023, so Mark could get me off his back, then later Steve was instructed to contact me and give me that "sense of accomplishment", so I'd finally let go.
If it hadn't been for that call, they might've succeeded.
Fabian, the sentence attributed to me: "...firmly convinced that electromagnetic waves have no impact on health" is not an accurate representation of my opinion.
It should read: Various harmful effects of electromagnetic waves are well researched, but that does not mean they are inherently or always harmful.
I'll end this here btw. The questions I am asking were rhetorical. I am surprised I even took the time for that, because you have been detrimental to my productivity long enough.
It is like George Bush Jr said: "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice... Well if you get fooled you can't get fooled again."
So bye bye, completely shutting you out of my life. I can only warn people to associate with you professionally.
@ readers: If he recommends you spend your last money on a 3k EUR oscilloscope, when you all want to do is extract hydrofluoric acid from cell phone emissions with a wet scrubber, don't listen to him. But I guess that's obvious. ;)
Well that is a long stretch from what you told me, but I'll correct the article to give people a more accurate picture of what happened, without alleging lack of knowledge about the dangers of novel EMI patterns on your end:
"who through his expertise as an electrical engineer seemed to be offering me help in my latest studies, but in retrospect gave me information and advice, that led me further off course. It was only when I cut my ties to him that I managed to connect the dots.
[corrected from: an electrical engineer claiming to be firmly convinced that electromagnetic waves have no impact on health]"
This is what happened. I have no idea why you did it, but if you are indeed aware of the health impact that electromagnetical waves can have on animal organisms, then this begs the following questions:
1. Why did you never leak this information to me, when I was stumbling around blindfolded?
2. Why did you never consider that EMI (5G? SpaceX? BT LE vulnerabilities?) is the reason for the decline in fertility, when all you had as evidence to blame vaccines were spotty coincidences, especially considering your lack of knowledge on pharmacology on one hand and your expertise an electrical engineering on the other?
3. Why did you repeatedly assist in misrepresenting the German mortality data with your focus on the annual ACM figures, failing to highlight the remarkable event towards the end of 2020, that largely determined the degree of excess mortality in 2021, which was falling into a time where barely anyone was vaccinated?
Also, with fertility still in decline as of 2025, don't you think it's time to make it clear that your assessment to misrepresent vaccines as the most likely cause for the fertility decline was more likely than not wrong and that a persistent novel noxious influence is much more likely to be the culprit?
So I think the argument is a bit more nuanced than that .Not claiming to be a brilliant mathematician, I was sent to Maths tutoring after school every week and Maths camps during school holidays, in the vain hope that something would stick.
But yes the number of doses given correlating with the rise in excess mortality ,seems simply a common sense measure of harm or lethality.
If I gave the general population ,of any country a hundred ,a thousand ,a million ,or ten million doses of 1 ml normal saline injections over the course of a year ,I would expect to see no correlation with excess deaths.
Because normal saline is harmless.
But say I gave the population of any country, a hundred ,a thousand , a million, or ten million doses /injections
of penicillin , knowing that about 10% of the population is allergic to penicillin, I would expect to see a rise in excess deaths ,corresponding to the number of doses received by the general population ,who were forced to accept the penicillin regardless of whether they had a known allergy to penicillin or not.
Think it over. It may be a new concept for you. Here is a therapeutic which has saved and continues to save millions of lives .But 10 % of the population should not receive it least they go into irrecoverable anaphylactic shock and die.
Unfortunately it's the same with most therapeutics.
There will be a proportion of the population ,for whom the therapeutic is lethal.
The time were the likes of you managed to unsettle me are over, Shelagh. The time when the likes of you, Rancourt and Mike Yeadon pay up is coming. You can't stop the truth from becoming common knowledge.
Wtf are you babbling there? I don't care what neurological flaw drives you, stupidity, greed, trauma, fear.. ED50 has nothing to do with this. So please just piss off and go fool the morons who listen to you.
I'm gonna explain what happened to people and you are not gonna be able to stop it.
Falun Gong's leader Li Hongzhi proclaimed himself as the Lord Buddha of the Universe (宇宙主佛) who was several times higher than Buddha and Jesus. He claims that humans were taught to develop technology by disembodied souls of aliens, so that humans will eventually build clones which can be inhabited by alien souls, and then the aliens will trick humans into outlawing natural reproduction, so that only clones that are inhabited by alien souls will be left on the earth: https://time.com/archive/6954898/interview-with-li-hongzhi-2/. It's similar to the Scientologist belief that humans are possessed by the souls of aliens, which were trapped on the Earth when Xenu's prisoner transport crashed into a volcano.
Sun Myung Moon, Li Hongzhi, and Miles Guo all moved from an East Asian country to New York to run their cult. And even though all cults have primarily targeted East Asian countries, they have also operated a multilingual media empire which has produced conspiracy content aimed at a western audience.
Last year I found a Chinese-language infographic which quoted Mike Yeadon promoting Rancourt's figure of 17 million deaths. It was tweeted 4 seconds apart by two different Guo bots, which both had a Spanish flag in their display name and which both posted in a mixture of Chinese and Spanish: https://sars2.net/bot2.html#Bots_that_have_promoted_Mike_Yeadon.
There were 6 tweets returned when I searched for `lang:ko denis rancourt`: https://x.com/search?q=lang%3Ako+rancourt&f=live. Three of them were posted by accounts called "Raelian Amor" and "Raelian yes", which promote the Raelian UFO cult that has many similarities to Falun Gong. Raelianism and Falun Gong are promoted by similar Twitter bots which also post content from the controlled MFM. And both of their emblems even feature a swastika, like the emblem of the Theosophical Society.
One of the Korean tweets about Rancourt was a quote tweet of a tweet by sophiadahl1, who posted a video where Yeadon talked about Rancourt: https://x.com/amor8156/status/1736637927072186715. The sophiadahl1 account portrays a Norwegian lady, but I think it's a bot. It often retweets random tweets in languages like Turkish or Portuguese. It promotes junk conspiracies like flat earth. It has posted a video where Reiner Füllmich said that viruses are fake at least three times, where the text of each tweet was nearly identical, but each time there was a different set of errors introduced to the text, so the text looked like it was humanized by some AI procedure which introduced random errors to the text: https://sars2.net/bot2.html#sophiadahl1_and_mariusknulst.
I see you are a real weasle like me. I love it. Thanks for this. I'll look into the links.
What's crystal clear to me at this point, is that technology is the culprit in these deaths and that the virus is a mere reaction by our bodies. Not a doubt in my mind about that.
Look at your 2020 GISAID dataset... If the virus is produced by the body, then why did the bodies of people all over the world start producing viruses with the B.1.1 mutations from late February 2020 onwards, but not earlier? Were people all over the world linked by some morphogenetic field, which caused them to receive instructions to start producing the G28881A, G28882A, and G28883C mutations?
Because the noxious agents virus particles are prepping our immune systems for must have changed. There were three major noxious agent that might have relevance. I'm trying to address these questions via data analysis, but I'm not optimistic that'll work out for various reasons.
Please be patient, until I've laid my entire hypothesis. Like I said to Geoff: We need to zoom out and look at the historical situation through the lens of systems biology to make sense of virology and the events accompanied by pandemics.
Why would the noxious agent have consistently resulted in the combination of G28881A+G28882A+G28883C to be produced all over the world? There's about 1e14 ways to choose a set of 3 nucleotide changes in a 29903-base genome.
Because viral evolution isn't really evolution, but a deterministic process? Cause nature is just that fucking perfect.
Didn't I ask you to be patient or give me a call instead? I really didn't intend to discuss this in the comment section... This is pretty stupid, but what the hell.
If you take all nucleated human cells that reside in living individuals, you arrive at roughly 2.4 octillion virions that could potentially be produced per day (2.4×10²⁷).
Of course, our cells have enough on their plate — and producing virions for purposes such as secretion to infect others is not something they waste energy on unless absolutely necessary. But since you're invoking orders of magnitude...
These 1e14 pathways you mention aren't equally likely — I'm sure you're aware of that. It's not a flat random distribution. Rather, the chances are constrained not only by thermodynamic principles but also by highly regulated, energy-dependent mechanisms within the host cell.
I mean, where do you think virions come from? They are perfectly adapted to the situation, to our needs.
Oh and if you don't want to be patient, feel free to contact me via pm and we'll have a call. Maybe you can contribute so I can refine the hypothesis. So far, I'm getting very promising feedback. Anyone enthusiastic about natural sciences is gonna love this I think.
Last year Neil, Engler, and Fenton wrote: "The first explanation is not credible given that Victoria state in Australia suffered a covid peak in July - August 2020, yet the state next door, New South Wales, did not. For this to make sense we would have to believe viruses stop at borders or that the lockdowns and border restrictions are dramatically effective. Evidence to date is overwhelming that neither of these can be true. Where did this highly infectious virus go after 'landing' in Victoria in 2020?"
It had a total of 15 SNVs from Wuhan-Hu-1. Its ancestor with 14 SNVs was found exclusively in NSW, but its ancestor with 13 SNVs was also found in Western Australia and Victoria. And ultimately it derived from a strain with 8 SNVs that was found exclusively in Victoria on GISAID. None of the ancestors with 8-14 mutations were found outside of Australia on GISAID, so you can see how Australia ended up developing its own local strains of the virus because it was isolated from other countries.
The following code selects submissions whose mutation set is a subset of the 15 mutations included in the NSW strain, and that have at least 7 shared mutations with the NSW strain. The first column shows the count of submissions with same combination of country, region, and mutation set, and the second column shows the number of SNVs from Wuhan-Hu-1:
However then was the chemtrail mixture modified over time to emulate the natural mutation of the virus in different geographic regions, so that different variants were added to the chemtrail mix in New South Wales and in Victoria? And every one or two weeks a new mutation was added to the mix that was sprayed in New South Wales?
Wuhan airport with 19,000,000+ passenger movements per year is far more effective than the stupid "chemtrail spraying" Fifth Column fantasy.
JJ Couey denial of replicating US Bioweapon Virus that can be measured in exhaled breath is another diversion.
Virus mutation in Australia was tracked by full genomic sequencing, all sequences uploaded to GSAID.
New South Wales gave weekly reports with details.
Australia's border closure dates would be useful in creation of a timeline.
The lockdowns in Australia were extremely effective and breakouts were fully documented. The spread of the Virus occurred well before the mass testing was available.
There are better explanations when you look at it through the lens of systems biology. Once you stop clinging onto these ideas, things will become crystal clear.
This is our chance to end 200 years of confusion and with it an entire industry.
These ideas Jikky holds seem quite ridiculous to me as well btw. Let's see how he reacts when I've laid out my hypothesis which will be open to experimental research.
Hints: Ask yourself...
1) What is the consequence of a virus infection? What lasting changes can be observed?
2) In what historical contexts have novel viral particles been described?
3) What properties would a virus need to have a place in evolution theory?
That's a nice story, but when you look closer and put it into historical context, you'll realize it makes little sense. I wonder why do you tell me this, Geoff. Are you worried I've come up with an entirely different explanation?
That shouldn't worry you, you should be looking forward to it.
It's a new perspective. One that might free us from this echo chamber of collective insanity that you are apparently a part of. Sorry, but I have to be frank.
Maybe it's time. You're born into a family that controls a large portion of the $101 trillion flowing on this planet every day. You see information, statistics on a large screen, sipping cognac on your $600 million yacht off Malta on a fine day in the Mediterranean. Like:
-- 55,,017 ships at sea (and growing) trying to keep up with our consumption, hauling fuel, food, Teslas and Vespas, iPhones and chemicals for factories.
-- We ate 11 million pounds of food per MINUTE in 2014. (HuffPost). Increasing. Over 90% of that lost out the other end.
-- 70% of fresh water goes for irrigation on ever-expanding farmlands.
-- 25,000 square miles of forest habitat were burned in Indonesia to plant palm oil trees due to heavy worldwide demand, for example.
-- 2050 end of fish stocks. 2080 end of gas. 2090 end of oil. True? Doesn't matter. It scares you.
You think to yourself, if only there were a way to get the mammal sterilization injections into humans to kindly, compassionately reduce baby count. An end to culling the herd on bloody battlefields. But saving planet Earth. They have a stellar track record for over 25 years in over 80 animal species. Except for the heavy menstrual bleeding. But at least the miscarriages are a useful feature.
This is really a message to those men, the architects, you're safe, guys, nobody cares, they can't even see the words Porcine Zona Pellucida and GonaCon, let alone look them up. We're an amazingly unintelligent life-form. But I think I get it, you want to do some good, in your important position, while here in this life, a legacy to consider. So here's my humble suggestion, think beyond this life too. Watch NDEs on youtube, you'll be convinced the other side is a pool of love. We're alive forever, countless lives, and what really counts?
It has always been a game of king-on-the-hill, right? And always deception it would appear. What if, larger than that, there's a bigger win, a higher hill.
What if you try honesty? Publish all the scary stats and offer gift cards for voluntary vasectomies. Men would step up to help you save the planet. No more covid-like scams needed, no fear campaigns, just say on TV, look guys, we have reason to be worried about this planet, will you join us in caring?
One of the main reasons I paused posting on my blog is my embarrassment with the sphere I found myself in, including the insane authors, dishonesty and more. I felt like the truth was drowning in the torrent of lying, attention-seeking, and money-grift.
I am glad to see you reply. And you know what Igor?
The other day I started thinking - how many people DO I know whose honesty I would vouch for?
It was a very very short list, but your name was on it. :)
I don’t know who this author is. They fraudulently added my name as coauthor, which I have removed.
I haven’t even read it. I’m busy.
Thanks,
Mike
Oh Mike, Mikey, old chap, I am so happy to see you here.
I thought I'd never hear from you again, after I told you yesterday, that you are going to pay for helping to cover up 30 million murders.
This was right after you told me: There are no viruses, actually addressing me with my first name.
It was right before you deleted our entire chat.
You know, I keep backups of Telegram chats, Mike. You've known me since 2021. You've seen my picture every week throughout 2025, in the same chat window as the messages you exchanged with me.
Saying you don't who I am was really dumb. And honestly: I really didn't think you were THAT stupid.
You can't lie your cowardly ass out of this. You have blood on your hands. The blood of 30 million innocent people, you dirty motherfucker.
As a Rancourt fanboy, do you have any comments on the critique of his analysis?
Funny huh? You'd think he'd be busy clearing up these 30 million murders, but apparently he has more important stuff on his plate now. Like counting dollar bills maybe.
Can you explain how you think Mike covered up 30 million murders?
If you people just started using their minds, we wouldn't find ourselves in this conundrum.
Too many chiefs... Not enough Indians
I was hoping it would become clear just by reading this article. If you want the detailed version you'll either have to be patient or write me a pm so I can explain in more detail in a call.
If you can wait or don't want to hear the long version in a call, I'll just say this:
There have been a little over 25mio excess deaths between 2020 and 2023.
Only 5 million are explained by the mysterious infectious disease COVID-19, if you understand it as such, but we don't have the faintest clue where this virus suddenly came from, so even those 5 million deaths are waiting to be explained - if you understand that pandemics don't just "pop up out of nowhere".
Almost the entire "resistance movement" has been lead to believe, the assessment of Prof. Rancourt was reliable. Mike was one of the loudest voices in that respect. Rancourt supplies an explanation for 17 out of those 20 million excess deaths. Once you realize that these claims are not only unfounded, but that highly influential background actors are pumping money into this narrative, you won't be able to avoid asking yourself:
What are they hiding?
I informed Mike about Rancourt's deception 4 months ago. Have you seen him correct his mistakes?
There is more about Mike that is deeply unsettling, in terms of his finances and who he's offered money to in the past, but I am not gonna go down that road. He's full of shit and I'll repeat that in front of any judge if I have to, but that's all people really need to know.
I just want to sensitize vaccine critics - which I still belong to - to the explanatory gap this revelation leaves behind, so we can focus on understanding what really happened and on the legal battles that lie ahead of us. And there will be plenty of those.
Judging by the immediate move to foul ad-hominem attack, I'd suggest that this is the work of 77th Brigade.
I haven't read it either.
You fanboys are never gonna listen to facts or cold logic, so I won't waste my time on explaining to you how criticizing him for covering up the cause of 30 mio. deaths is not an ad hominem attack and neither is calling him a dirty motherfucker for it.
Calling you fanboy - which you are - THAT is an ad hominem attack. So fuck off, fanboy.
Last year David Allen published a paper where he employed the same trick. He got a positive correlation across regions of Australia between excess deaths and vaccine doses administered, but he didn't adjust either variable for population size. When I adjusted both variables for population size, the correlation became negative: https://sars2.net/rootclaim2.html#David_Allens_correlation_between_excess_deaths_and_vaccine_doses_across_Australian_regions.
Nicolas Hulscher keeps promoting Allen's paper, even though he has been informed of the error multiple times by me and Peter Hegarty: https://x.com/search?q=(from%3Ahenjin256+OR+from%3Apeterhegarty17)+%40nichulscher+allen&f=live.
I would say, these people have really earned themselves their spot in the network.
Peter Hegarty brought up a good point on Twitter (https://x.com/PeterHegarty17/status/1938592363598725222):
> I recall seeing graphs like this in the first paper of theirs I reviewed, the one that looked at EM in 17 Southern Hemisphere and tropical countries. I assume the context for the above graph is similar. The central hypothesis of Rancourt et al in all these papers is that *all* post-rollout EM is due to the vaccines. Their argument for this mostly centers around purported temporal correlations between rates of vax uptake and rates of EM. In the paper I reviewed, graphs like this one were made in order to estimate the "dose fatality rate" *assuming* their central hypothesis was true, rather than as evidence in and of themselves *for* this hypothesis. Hence, it's not the same situation as with Allen's paper. Admittedly, I recall that when I first read their paper, it took me a while to realize they weren't claiming such graphs were themselves part of the evidence *for* their hypothesis, and that they could have been much clearer.
Rancourt's Figure 52 was included in a section titled "Calculated risk of death per injection from COVID-19 vaccines", where the authors calculated a global vDFR value as a median of the vDFR values in various countries. So perhaps the purpose of Figure 52 was to demonstrate how much variation there was in vDFR between countries, or which countries were outliers in terms of vDFR.
However Rancourt et al. also wrote: "For all the time periods in Figure 52 (and Figure 53), the correlations are generally strong (r ≥ 0.60) or very strong (r ≥ 0.80), and the intercepts are zero within error, which implies proportionality. The excess all-cause mortality in these time periods is proportional to the number of COVID-19 vaccine injections given." But they didn't make it clear enough that the high correlation was due to a lack of adjustment for population size.
Rancourt derived his figure of 17 million vaccine deaths by assuming that all excess deaths after the vaccine rollout were due to the vaccines. People still promote his figure, even though in a paper he published last December, he now said that there were not necessarily too many deaths that were directly caused by vaccines, which is incompatible with his earlier assumption that all excess deaths were due to the vaccines. In the paper he wrote the following (https://correlation-canada.org/respiratory-epidemics-without-viral-transmission/):
> In the high-quality databases for the USA, there is a close match between the weekly reported COVID-19 mortality and weekly excess all-cause mortality, in the Covid period (2020-2022), including prior to and during the vaccine rollouts (CDC, 2023).
> To the degree that COVID-19 death assignation represents a serious respiratory condition at death, and given the intricate weekly temporal matching of the reported COVID-19 mortality and excess all-cause mortality for up to 3 years in the USA data, this represents strong evidence that respiratory infections were dominantly (virtually entirely) associated with the excess all-cause mortality.
> [...]
> Recently, Rancourt et al. (in preparation) analysed national mortality data in one country in which COVID-19 vaccination status was known at death, including the history of COVID-19 vaccinations, in a case in which the country exhibited rapid vaccine rollouts strongly temporally associated with observed surges in excess all-cause mortality. They found that relevant peaks in excess all-cause mortality associated with booster rollouts could not preferentially be assigned to booster-vaccinated individuals (and also that the vaccine had no detectable survival benefit).
> This means that the COVID-19 vaccination primary cause described in Section 3.3.5 did not produce a measurable increase in excess all-cause mortality in this country, which in turn means that sharp peaks in excess all-cause mortality which are temporally associated with rapid vaccine rollouts need not imply that COVID-19 vaccination is a primary cause of death. Rather, it seems that (as pervasive as they are) such temporal associations between mortality peaks and rapid vaccine rollouts are due to the primary cause described in Section 3.3.6 of campaigns and measures associated in time and place with COVID-19 vaccine rollouts. Although non-conclusive in general, this is consistent with the fact that the vaccine toxicity causing death inferred from populationwide adverse-effect monitoring is usually too small to be detected directly in populationwide (e.g., national) cause-independent all-cause mortality, as per analyses of USA VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System) data (Hickey and Rancourt, 2022).
> This would mean that the lethality of medical measures imposed during the Covid period and during vaccine rollouts is much greater than generally acknowledged, and much greater than the known (VAERS, autopsies, etc.) vaccine toxicity itself.
After I pointed out to Rancourt that his new view seems to have been incompatible with his earlier estimate of 17 million vaccine deaths, he published a Substack post where he said that his figure of 17 million still stands, but there were rather millions people who were killed indirectly by measures associated with vaccination, like "more aggressive or extreme immobilization and isolation enforcement during the vaccine rollout", "psychological stress of being coerced into re-vaccination", "disrupted patient care schedule", or "transmitted stress of the attendants": https://sars2.net/nopandemic.html#Figure_of_17_million_vaccine_deaths_in_view_of_Rancourts_later_opinion_about_excess_deaths_in_2024. It seemed like he was jumping through hoops to try to reconcile his conflicting statements.
When Rancourt wrote about "national mortality data in one country in which COVID-19 vaccination status was known at death", I think he was talking about the Czech record-level data. I offered to help him review his manuscript in case he meant the Czech dataset, because I'm probably the world's leading expert on the Czech data, but he didn't reply to me.
In the Czech Republic, the rollout of the first booster dose roughly coincided with a spike in deaths in November to December 2021 if you look at all ages aggregated together. But if you split out the data by age group, the deaths peaked about a month after the booster rollout in ages 80+ but about a month before the booster rollout in ages 40-59: https://sars2.net/czech.html#Daily_deaths_and_vaccine_doses_by_age_group.
Age-stratified data exposes a major weakness in Rancourt's approach of temporally correlating spikes in deaths with periods when a new vaccine dose was rolled out. Rancourt's southern-hemisphere paper also included age-startified plots for Chile and Peru, which showed date on the x-axis and deaths and new vaccine doses on the y-axis. You could easily see that the deaths peaked around the same time in all age groups, even though new vaccine doses were rolled out earlier to older age groups and later to younger age groups.
"When Rancourt wrote about "national mortality data in one country in which COVID-19 vaccination status was known at death", I think he was talking about the Czech record-level data. I offered to help him review his manuscript in case he meant the Czech dataset, because I'm probably the world's leading expert on the Czech data, but he didn't reply to me."
Exactly. I tried contacting both him and Steve Kirsch for an eternity.
Neither ever reacted. We are out of their league in terms of moral integrity. They can't control us and they know it, so their job is to steer clear of us, unless told otherwise.
Russ Wolfinger was told otherwise sometime in 2023, so Mark could get me off his back, then later Steve was instructed to contact me and give me that "sense of accomplishment", so I'd finally let go.
If it hadn't been for that call, they might've succeeded.
Fabian, the sentence attributed to me: "...firmly convinced that electromagnetic waves have no impact on health" is not an accurate representation of my opinion.
It should read: Various harmful effects of electromagnetic waves are well researched, but that does not mean they are inherently or always harmful.
Please correct your article accordingly.
I'll end this here btw. The questions I am asking were rhetorical. I am surprised I even took the time for that, because you have been detrimental to my productivity long enough.
It is like George Bush Jr said: "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice... Well if you get fooled you can't get fooled again."
So bye bye, completely shutting you out of my life. I can only warn people to associate with you professionally.
@ readers: If he recommends you spend your last money on a 3k EUR oscilloscope, when you all want to do is extract hydrofluoric acid from cell phone emissions with a wet scrubber, don't listen to him. But I guess that's obvious. ;)
Well that is a long stretch from what you told me, but I'll correct the article to give people a more accurate picture of what happened, without alleging lack of knowledge about the dangers of novel EMI patterns on your end:
"who through his expertise as an electrical engineer seemed to be offering me help in my latest studies, but in retrospect gave me information and advice, that led me further off course. It was only when I cut my ties to him that I managed to connect the dots.
[corrected from: an electrical engineer claiming to be firmly convinced that electromagnetic waves have no impact on health]"
This is what happened. I have no idea why you did it, but if you are indeed aware of the health impact that electromagnetical waves can have on animal organisms, then this begs the following questions:
1. Why did you never leak this information to me, when I was stumbling around blindfolded?
2. Why did you never consider that EMI (5G? SpaceX? BT LE vulnerabilities?) is the reason for the decline in fertility, when all you had as evidence to blame vaccines were spotty coincidences, especially considering your lack of knowledge on pharmacology on one hand and your expertise an electrical engineering on the other?
3. Why did you repeatedly assist in misrepresenting the German mortality data with your focus on the annual ACM figures, failing to highlight the remarkable event towards the end of 2020, that largely determined the degree of excess mortality in 2021, which was falling into a time where barely anyone was vaccinated?
Also, with fertility still in decline as of 2025, don't you think it's time to make it clear that your assessment to misrepresent vaccines as the most likely cause for the fertility decline was more likely than not wrong and that a persistent novel noxious influence is much more likely to be the culprit?
So I think the argument is a bit more nuanced than that .Not claiming to be a brilliant mathematician, I was sent to Maths tutoring after school every week and Maths camps during school holidays, in the vain hope that something would stick.
But yes the number of doses given correlating with the rise in excess mortality ,seems simply a common sense measure of harm or lethality.
If I gave the general population ,of any country a hundred ,a thousand ,a million ,or ten million doses of 1 ml normal saline injections over the course of a year ,I would expect to see no correlation with excess deaths.
Because normal saline is harmless.
But say I gave the population of any country, a hundred ,a thousand , a million, or ten million doses /injections
of penicillin , knowing that about 10% of the population is allergic to penicillin, I would expect to see a rise in excess deaths ,corresponding to the number of doses received by the general population ,who were forced to accept the penicillin regardless of whether they had a known allergy to penicillin or not.
Think it over. It may be a new concept for you. Here is a therapeutic which has saved and continues to save millions of lives .But 10 % of the population should not receive it least they go into irrecoverable anaphylactic shock and die.
Unfortunately it's the same with most therapeutics.
There will be a proportion of the population ,for whom the therapeutic is lethal.
With all due respect ,your graphs make no sense.
Your graphs ,make no sense.
So you come here to expose yourself as
1. either a chaos agent
2. or unforgivably stupid
as well.
Thank you.
The time were the likes of you managed to unsettle me are over, Shelagh. The time when the likes of you, Rancourt and Mike Yeadon pay up is coming. You can't stop the truth from becoming common knowledge.
I must be over the target if all you can offer is ad hominem attacks.
Therapeutic index, ED50, TD50 and LD50
https://derangedphysiology.com/main/cicm-primary-exam/pharmacodynamics/Chapter-413/therapeutic-index-ed50-td50-and-ld50
Wtf are you babbling there? I don't care what neurological flaw drives you, stupidity, greed, trauma, fear.. ED50 has nothing to do with this. So please just piss off and go fool the morons who listen to you.
I'm gonna explain what happened to people and you are not gonna be able to stop it.
Waiting to hear more. In the meantime, thank you🙂
It's gonna be really exciting stuff. Not just criminologically, but scientifically exciting.
Last year a video of animated plots from Rancourt's southern hemisphere paper went viral. The video had a watermark for Frontline Health, and it was narrated by Dan Skorbach who is the host of the Frontline Health show on Epoch TV: https://x.com/denisrancourt/status/1758503759653585165. An article from 2013 said that Skorbach had been a practicioner of Falun Gong for five years: https://en.minghui.org/html/articles/2013/8/28/141725.html.
Falun Gong's leader Li Hongzhi proclaimed himself as the Lord Buddha of the Universe (宇宙主佛) who was several times higher than Buddha and Jesus. He claims that humans were taught to develop technology by disembodied souls of aliens, so that humans will eventually build clones which can be inhabited by alien souls, and then the aliens will trick humans into outlawing natural reproduction, so that only clones that are inhabited by alien souls will be left on the earth: https://time.com/archive/6954898/interview-with-li-hongzhi-2/. It's similar to the Scientologist belief that humans are possessed by the souls of aliens, which were trapped on the Earth when Xenu's prisoner transport crashed into a volcano.
Sun Myung Moon, Li Hongzhi, and Miles Guo all moved from an East Asian country to New York to run their cult. And even though all cults have primarily targeted East Asian countries, they have also operated a multilingual media empire which has produced conspiracy content aimed at a western audience.
Last year I found a Chinese-language infographic which quoted Mike Yeadon promoting Rancourt's figure of 17 million deaths. It was tweeted 4 seconds apart by two different Guo bots, which both had a Spanish flag in their display name and which both posted in a mixture of Chinese and Spanish: https://sars2.net/bot2.html#Bots_that_have_promoted_Mike_Yeadon.
There were 6 tweets returned when I searched for `lang:ko denis rancourt`: https://x.com/search?q=lang%3Ako+rancourt&f=live. Three of them were posted by accounts called "Raelian Amor" and "Raelian yes", which promote the Raelian UFO cult that has many similarities to Falun Gong. Raelianism and Falun Gong are promoted by similar Twitter bots which also post content from the controlled MFM. And both of their emblems even feature a swastika, like the emblem of the Theosophical Society.
One of the Korean tweets about Rancourt was a quote tweet of a tweet by sophiadahl1, who posted a video where Yeadon talked about Rancourt: https://x.com/amor8156/status/1736637927072186715. The sophiadahl1 account portrays a Norwegian lady, but I think it's a bot. It often retweets random tweets in languages like Turkish or Portuguese. It promotes junk conspiracies like flat earth. It has posted a video where Reiner Füllmich said that viruses are fake at least three times, where the text of each tweet was nearly identical, but each time there was a different set of errors introduced to the text, so the text looked like it was humanized by some AI procedure which introduced random errors to the text: https://sars2.net/bot2.html#sophiadahl1_and_mariusknulst.
I see you are a real weasle like me. I love it. Thanks for this. I'll look into the links.
What's crystal clear to me at this point, is that technology is the culprit in these deaths and that the virus is a mere reaction by our bodies. Not a doubt in my mind about that.
Look at your 2020 GISAID dataset... If the virus is produced by the body, then why did the bodies of people all over the world start producing viruses with the B.1.1 mutations from late February 2020 onwards, but not earlier? Were people all over the world linked by some morphogenetic field, which caused them to receive instructions to start producing the G28881A, G28882A, and G28883C mutations?
Because the noxious agents virus particles are prepping our immune systems for must have changed. There were three major noxious agent that might have relevance. I'm trying to address these questions via data analysis, but I'm not optimistic that'll work out for various reasons.
Please be patient, until I've laid my entire hypothesis. Like I said to Geoff: We need to zoom out and look at the historical situation through the lens of systems biology to make sense of virology and the events accompanied by pandemics.
Why would the noxious agent have consistently resulted in the combination of G28881A+G28882A+G28883C to be produced all over the world? There's about 1e14 ways to choose a set of 3 nucleotide changes in a 29903-base genome.
Because viral evolution isn't really evolution, but a deterministic process? Cause nature is just that fucking perfect.
Didn't I ask you to be patient or give me a call instead? I really didn't intend to discuss this in the comment section... This is pretty stupid, but what the hell.
If you take all nucleated human cells that reside in living individuals, you arrive at roughly 2.4 octillion virions that could potentially be produced per day (2.4×10²⁷).
Of course, our cells have enough on their plate — and producing virions for purposes such as secretion to infect others is not something they waste energy on unless absolutely necessary. But since you're invoking orders of magnitude...
These 1e14 pathways you mention aren't equally likely — I'm sure you're aware of that. It's not a flat random distribution. Rather, the chances are constrained not only by thermodynamic principles but also by highly regulated, energy-dependent mechanisms within the host cell.
I mean, where do you think virions come from? They are perfectly adapted to the situation, to our needs.
Anyway, this is as far as I’ll take this.
Oh and if you don't want to be patient, feel free to contact me via pm and we'll have a call. Maybe you can contribute so I can refine the hypothesis. So far, I'm getting very promising feedback. Anyone enthusiastic about natural sciences is gonna love this I think.
Albert mentioned this article, so I popped in to see how the discussion is going.
Key points from my perspective:
The Covid19 virus is a US designed Bioweapon
I was infected with it early in 2020 after a plane load of people arrived in Melbourne Airport from Wuhan
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/first-detected-covid19-case-arrived
Drugs given to victims killed a large number of people whether they were jabbed or not.
Australia experienced a massive surge of cases and Deaths after external and internal borders were opened.
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/australias-plan-to-deliberately-spread
Last year Neil, Engler, and Fenton wrote: "The first explanation is not credible given that Victoria state in Australia suffered a covid peak in July - August 2020, yet the state next door, New South Wales, did not. For this to make sense we would have to believe viruses stop at borders or that the lockdowns and border restrictions are dramatically effective. Evidence to date is overwhelming that neither of these can be true. Where did this highly infectious virus go after 'landing' in Victoria in 2020?"
I used Spieker's GISAID data to trace the geographical migration of an Australian strain of SARS-CoV-2 that was common in New South Wales in August 2020: https://sars2.net/nopandemic.html#Neil_Engler_and_Fenton_The_puzzle_of_Australias_respiratory_mortality_season_2020.
It had a total of 15 SNVs from Wuhan-Hu-1. Its ancestor with 14 SNVs was found exclusively in NSW, but its ancestor with 13 SNVs was also found in Western Australia and Victoria. And ultimately it derived from a strain with 8 SNVs that was found exclusively in Victoria on GISAID. None of the ancestors with 8-14 mutations were found outside of Australia on GISAID, so you can see how Australia ended up developing its own local strains of the virus because it was isolated from other countries.
The following code selects submissions whose mutation set is a subset of the 15 mutations included in the NSW strain, and that have at least 7 shared mutations with the NSW strain. The first column shows the count of submissions with same combination of country, region, and mutation set, and the second column shows the number of SNVs from Wuhan-Hu-1:
curl -Ls sars2.net/f/gisaid2020.tsv.xz|xz -dc>gisaid2020.tsv
awk -F\\t 'NR==FNR{a[$0];next}!$19{n=0;split($12,b,",");for(i in b){if(b[i]in a)n++;else next}if(n>=7)o[n FS$6 FS$7 FS$12]++}END{for(i in o)print o[i]FS i}' <(tr , \\n<<<A1163T,C3037T,T7540C,C8950T,C14408T,G16647T,C18555T,C22480T,G22992A,G23401A,A23403G,G24764T,G28881A,G28882A,G28883C) gisaid2020.tsv|sort -rnk2
Jikkyleaks is a believer in J.J. Couey's clone theory, and he says that SARS-CoV-2 fails to transmit from person to person because it's a clone: https://x.com/Jikkyleaks/status/1847247739970523501, https://x.com/Jikkyleaks/status/1636868259617345536, https://x.com/Jikkyleaks/status/1839755738224439610, https://x.com/Jikkyleaks/status/1818605156159656383. He even came up with the #SprayGate hashtag inspired by JC's theory. When JC said the bad guys were "spraying" clones, it was never clear to me if the clones were being sprayed in spray bottles, the kind of trucks they had in Wuhan, or in chemtrails. But Jikky seems to think it's chemtrails: https://x.com/Jikkyleaks/status/1908816143915393150, https://x.com/Jikkyleaks/status/1888059464500265123.
However then was the chemtrail mixture modified over time to emulate the natural mutation of the virus in different geographic regions, so that different variants were added to the chemtrail mix in New South Wales and in Victoria? And every one or two weeks a new mutation was added to the mix that was sprayed in New South Wales?
Was it this one?
https://substack.com/@covdata/note/c-18223921
That fascinated me also when I was still busy with GISAID data. My explanations were wrong however, like almost everything else I thought was true.
Stop the chemtrail stuff. It's ridiculous. There is a much easier explanation for everything we saw and I promise to lay it out very soon.
Arkmedic = Jikky also denies moon landings.
Wuhan airport with 19,000,000+ passenger movements per year is far more effective than the stupid "chemtrail spraying" Fifth Column fantasy.
JJ Couey denial of replicating US Bioweapon Virus that can be measured in exhaled breath is another diversion.
Virus mutation in Australia was tracked by full genomic sequencing, all sequences uploaded to GSAID.
New South Wales gave weekly reports with details.
Australia's border closure dates would be useful in creation of a timeline.
The lockdowns in Australia were extremely effective and breakouts were fully documented. The spread of the Virus occurred well before the mass testing was available.
Our organisms do not produce "bioweapons".
There are better explanations when you look at it through the lens of systems biology. Once you stop clinging onto these ideas, things will become crystal clear.
This is our chance to end 200 years of confusion and with it an entire industry.
These ideas Jikky holds seem quite ridiculous to me as well btw. Let's see how he reacts when I've laid out my hypothesis which will be open to experimental research.
Hints: Ask yourself...
1) What is the consequence of a virus infection? What lasting changes can be observed?
2) In what historical contexts have novel viral particles been described?
3) What properties would a virus need to have a place in evolution theory?
That's a nice story, but when you look closer and put it into historical context, you'll realize it makes little sense. I wonder why do you tell me this, Geoff. Are you worried I've come up with an entirely different explanation?
That shouldn't worry you, you should be looking forward to it.
It's a new perspective. One that might free us from this echo chamber of collective insanity that you are apparently a part of. Sorry, but I have to be frank.
Maybe it's time. You're born into a family that controls a large portion of the $101 trillion flowing on this planet every day. You see information, statistics on a large screen, sipping cognac on your $600 million yacht off Malta on a fine day in the Mediterranean. Like:
-- 55,,017 ships at sea (and growing) trying to keep up with our consumption, hauling fuel, food, Teslas and Vespas, iPhones and chemicals for factories.
-- We ate 11 million pounds of food per MINUTE in 2014. (HuffPost). Increasing. Over 90% of that lost out the other end.
-- 70% of fresh water goes for irrigation on ever-expanding farmlands.
-- 25,000 square miles of forest habitat were burned in Indonesia to plant palm oil trees due to heavy worldwide demand, for example.
-- 2050 end of fish stocks. 2080 end of gas. 2090 end of oil. True? Doesn't matter. It scares you.
You think to yourself, if only there were a way to get the mammal sterilization injections into humans to kindly, compassionately reduce baby count. An end to culling the herd on bloody battlefields. But saving planet Earth. They have a stellar track record for over 25 years in over 80 animal species. Except for the heavy menstrual bleeding. But at least the miscarriages are a useful feature.
This is really a message to those men, the architects, you're safe, guys, nobody cares, they can't even see the words Porcine Zona Pellucida and GonaCon, let alone look them up. We're an amazingly unintelligent life-form. But I think I get it, you want to do some good, in your important position, while here in this life, a legacy to consider. So here's my humble suggestion, think beyond this life too. Watch NDEs on youtube, you'll be convinced the other side is a pool of love. We're alive forever, countless lives, and what really counts?
It has always been a game of king-on-the-hill, right? And always deception it would appear. What if, larger than that, there's a bigger win, a higher hill.
What if you try honesty? Publish all the scary stats and offer gift cards for voluntary vasectomies. Men would step up to help you save the planet. No more covid-like scams needed, no fear campaigns, just say on TV, look guys, we have reason to be worried about this planet, will you join us in caring?
Fascinating. Three authors but written in the first person singular.
You'll understand in time.
I’m not an author. No idea why they added me.
Ah. Glad I suspended judgement; but I was “had”, to a degree. Shudda known.