This post is great - it's very good to be able to draw conclusions from the bulk, so to speak, data, as the detailed stats are being actively corrupted around the globe as we speak!
I have very strong evidence for booster administration data being delayed through bundling which distorts the temporal (and presumably direct causal) relationship between boosters and the Omicron outbreak of early 2022.
Still writing the article. I want to get it all right since this is a pretty profound finding.
By the way, I had a note about immune tolerance in my article about German excess mortality. This is not what is happening though. What is happening has been explained in detail in Geert vanden Bossches video "5 past 12" and that is what I will support with epidemiological evidence.
As they said in "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory": "Every time you wing, you get the wong number"?
It seems like Geert is not aware of the IgG4 phenomenon. I will ask him to reflect on this, as the outcome of the immune refocusing and immune tolerance will be pretty much the same - continuous prolonged infections, very similar in billions of jab recipients, allowing the virus evolve and test populations. Sooner or later it will strike the jackpot. But with two of these going together?
Immune tolerance doesn't explain the new variants popping up after each large campaign. Yes I was referring to the issue of immune refocusing after mRNA product mediated imprinting.
Germany is a riddle to me at the moment. According to the official stats, they pretty much stopped jabbing, comparing to Canada and the US, and more importantly to Switzerland and Austria, but Germany's Covid mortality is going through the roof anyhow. How come?
I also suspect that Switzerland, being the host country of WEF and the Templar baby, is getting very little of the the real mRNA jabs, mostly saline. Can't explain it any other way.
What happens in Canada is a systemic under-reporting of the "Covid" mortality data, and extremely delayed reporting of excess mortality in general, to the point of no reporting at all. The US is probably similar to Canada in qualifying deaths now as anything BUT Covid, and not releasing the data on the vaccination status of hospitalized/deceased.
Thanks.. I hate the injections, and keen to see good evidence that boosters only make matters worse...I just found the logic of this analysis hard to follow.. I will read it over again...
I am trying to stop my 22 year old son take his 3rd just to get a job..
I usually use Photoshop, but this time I wrote code to create the svg graphics (text based vector graphics) automatically which only took a few hours. I can now update them with a single click.
If you are having trouble understanding the dependent variables after reading through the Methods section again, I'll try to put it into different words. Just let me know.
The dependent variable being a point in time (or either the two time periods that correspond that precede or follow) was not an easily understandable concept for me either. It took me some time to wrap my head around it.
I'd rather work with plain case rates, but I'm afraid these are too strongly affected by region-specific confounding factors. The dependent variable was born out of having to control for all confounders.
Canada, for one, stopped testing at the beginning of March 2022, so obviously the registered cases went down dramatically. So did other countries. The more reliable indicator is deaths, although the authorities are now inclined to dismiss rather than bemoan the Covid deaths, so that is skewed too. Anyhow, your death regression charts look much more convincing, would've been even more so if not for the malevolent interference of PTBs.
I haven't given it enough thought yet. I'm currently riting another article trying to prove that reporting delays in boosters are distorting the causal relationship between booster doses and the omicron wave.
Boosters were the pandemic of 2022. I'll present much stronger evidence than this. It's absolutely ridiculous and I have no idea why it wasn't noticed yet.
Fabian, could you please make a formal PDF of these findings and start emailing it out to the medical doctor heads of various departments of hospitals in your country? Send these emails one by one rather than as a group email so that it is personal. I say heads rather than administrative employees, because the actual medical doctors will have the background to know what is happening and recognize its importance. Likewise, their opinion will be of importance to the administration who eventually decides to cancel requirements for boosters. Medical universities who have new batches of young students coming in April would be a good place to start, to hopefully protect some young people against the fully vaxxed requirement that has been in place the last 2 years.
That is an excellent idea. I have a list of all email addresses of the administrative departments of all German hospitals, but would have to figure out the addresses of the head doctors.
If anyone can help with lists of email addresses, I am all ears. Make sure not to post them here though, since some people would probably consider it sensitive information.
I find it difficult to see the causation.. if more boosters delays the time to 50% deaths then could that not be interpreted as the product provided a longer period of protection...?
I thought i saw a correlation between low booster rates and getting most of it out of the way early... confounders could be total cases/deaths. Which and not used because of differences in culture. But those graphs for total counts are similarly angled from what i remember.
Wouldn't that mean the pandemic is being prolonged by the boosters though, which is my hypothesis?
I'm open for alternative explanations and will definitely keep thinking about what you said, but the picture is getting more dense with every bit of information I've gathered.
VAERS shows rebound infections are peaking during week 28 after patients received their second dose and during week 14 after patients received a booster. You can find this in my last article about German mortality.
On top of that, a letter recently published in nejm found very long virus shedding periods for people who suffer a breakthrough infection after being boosted, but not for those who did not receive a booster. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2202092
In my next article I will show that booster doses are leading cases by 3 months and how this relationship is being obfuscated by booster dose reporting delays.
Deaths per day and cases per day are affected by population age.
If either of those was our dependent variable, we would have to control for population age.
Our dependent variable is just the 'number of weeks for the first 50% of cases/deaths to occur' though and I cannot see that being affected by population age.
ModRNA vaccines are falsely labelled as mRNA vaccines. In the media, modRNA and mRNA are treated as the same thing.
There are no mRNA vaccines for COVID-19 as far as I know.
I do not care about the legal definition of either word. If modRNA-based vaccines can legally be called mRNA vaccines, the laws are wrong, because chemically these two substance classes are distinct from one another:
- mRNA consists of the same 5 nucleotides present in all naturally occuring DNA/RNA (uridine, adenosine, thymidine, cytidine and guanosine)
- modRNA has uridine replaced with 1-methyl-pseudouridine
There are probably other codon optimizations that are being implemented to achieve whatever the manufacturer considers effectivity.
Endogenous substances and processes are those that originate from within a living organism.
And finally, this is an article about (exogenous = coming from outside of the organism) modRNA, which is contained in the vaccines by Biontech and Moderna:
The main difference between (endogenous) mRNA and (exogenous) modRNA is their respective half-lives. mRNA has a half life that is estimated to be around 10 hours, while modRNA can be translated for weeks.
No, neither of these is traditional. Both should be considered ATMP's (Advanced Technology Medical Products).
In genetics, the vector is the vehicle that delivers a payload.
Our payload is the spike protein blueprint.
The two technologies you refer to are two different vectors:
Vector 1 is modRNA encapsulated in nanoparticles
Vector 2 is DNA carried by an adenovirus
In the media you will often hear the term "vector-based". This is referring to adenovirus vaccines (like the ones from AstraZeneca and J&J).
Strictly speaking both modRNA-based and adenoviral vaccines are gene therapeutics that use a vector to deliver a payload. One through infection, one through transfection. An adenovirus infection however is a more natural process than the transfection via modRNA nanoparticulate.
This post is great - it's very good to be able to draw conclusions from the bulk, so to speak, data, as the detailed stats are being actively corrupted around the globe as we speak!
This corroborates another recent discovery of the novel ways the immune system gets disabled when it comes to Covid jabs: https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/booster-caused-immune-tolerance-explains
Thank you :)
I have very strong evidence for booster administration data being delayed through bundling which distorts the temporal (and presumably direct causal) relationship between boosters and the Omicron outbreak of early 2022.
Still writing the article. I want to get it all right since this is a pretty profound finding.
By the way, I had a note about immune tolerance in my article about German excess mortality. This is not what is happening though. What is happening has been explained in detail in Geert vanden Bossches video "5 past 12" and that is what I will support with epidemiological evidence.
Yes, I saw strange delays in jabbing data - probably to throw off the data snoopers. Not only in Germany.
You mean immune refocusing phenomenon as described by Vanden Boschee? https://voiceforscienceandsolidarity.substack.com/p/it-is-5-past-12
As they said in "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory": "Every time you wing, you get the wong number"?
It seems like Geert is not aware of the IgG4 phenomenon. I will ask him to reflect on this, as the outcome of the immune refocusing and immune tolerance will be pretty much the same - continuous prolonged infections, very similar in billions of jab recipients, allowing the virus evolve and test populations. Sooner or later it will strike the jackpot. But with two of these going together?
Immune tolerance doesn't explain the new variants popping up after each large campaign. Yes I was referring to the issue of immune refocusing after mRNA product mediated imprinting.
Germany is a riddle to me at the moment. According to the official stats, they pretty much stopped jabbing, comparing to Canada and the US, and more importantly to Switzerland and Austria, but Germany's Covid mortality is going through the roof anyhow. How come?
I also suspect that Switzerland, being the host country of WEF and the Templar baby, is getting very little of the the real mRNA jabs, mostly saline. Can't explain it any other way.
What happens in Canada is a systemic under-reporting of the "Covid" mortality data, and extremely delayed reporting of excess mortality in general, to the point of no reporting at all. The US is probably similar to Canada in qualifying deaths now as anything BUT Covid, and not releasing the data on the vaccination status of hospitalized/deceased.
Well, since less than 5% of bivalent boosters administered here were by Moderna, XBB only takes up less than 2% of all variants.
So for we have a slightly different situation from the US or Canada where Moderna's bivalent boosters boosted XBB.
Most of the current mortality here isn't covid mortality though atm
Thanks.. I hate the injections, and keen to see good evidence that boosters only make matters worse...I just found the logic of this analysis hard to follow.. I will read it over again...
I am trying to stop my 22 year old son take his 3rd just to get a job..
You have done a pile of work here though..
I usually use Photoshop, but this time I wrote code to create the svg graphics (text based vector graphics) automatically which only took a few hours. I can now update them with a single click.
If you are having trouble understanding the dependent variables after reading through the Methods section again, I'll try to put it into different words. Just let me know.
The dependent variable being a point in time (or either the two time periods that correspond that precede or follow) was not an easily understandable concept for me either. It took me some time to wrap my head around it.
I'd rather work with plain case rates, but I'm afraid these are too strongly affected by region-specific confounding factors. The dependent variable was born out of having to control for all confounders.
Let him read this: https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/booster-caused-immune-tolerance-explains
Canada, for one, stopped testing at the beginning of March 2022, so obviously the registered cases went down dramatically. So did other countries. The more reliable indicator is deaths, although the authorities are now inclined to dismiss rather than bemoan the Covid deaths, so that is skewed too. Anyhow, your death regression charts look much more convincing, would've been even more so if not for the malevolent interference of PTBs.
That is very interesting.
I ran the analysis on the first 20% of cases 2020-01-01 until today and found a Pearson correlation of almost 0.8.
When I run it on the first 20% of cases 2021-07-01 until today I get 0.7.
When I run it on the first 50% of cases 2021-07-01 until today I get less than 0.6.
However for deaths the effect seems to become more pronounced over time.
Meaning?
I haven't given it enough thought yet. I'm currently riting another article trying to prove that reporting delays in boosters are distorting the causal relationship between booster doses and the omicron wave.
Boosters were the pandemic of 2022. I'll present much stronger evidence than this. It's absolutely ridiculous and I have no idea why it wasn't noticed yet.
Fabian, could you please make a formal PDF of these findings and start emailing it out to the medical doctor heads of various departments of hospitals in your country? Send these emails one by one rather than as a group email so that it is personal. I say heads rather than administrative employees, because the actual medical doctors will have the background to know what is happening and recognize its importance. Likewise, their opinion will be of importance to the administration who eventually decides to cancel requirements for boosters. Medical universities who have new batches of young students coming in April would be a good place to start, to hopefully protect some young people against the fully vaxxed requirement that has been in place the last 2 years.
That is an excellent idea. I have a list of all email addresses of the administrative departments of all German hospitals, but would have to figure out the addresses of the head doctors.
If anyone can help with lists of email addresses, I am all ears. Make sure not to post them here though, since some people would probably consider it sensitive information.
I can send you some eventually, but an easier method for most people, with rare exception, is 1stName.LastName(at)institution.de.
I find it difficult to see the causation.. if more boosters delays the time to 50% deaths then could that not be interpreted as the product provided a longer period of protection...?
I thought i saw a correlation between low booster rates and getting most of it out of the way early... confounders could be total cases/deaths. Which and not used because of differences in culture. But those graphs for total counts are similarly angled from what i remember.
Wouldn't that mean the pandemic is being prolonged by the boosters though, which is my hypothesis?
I'm open for alternative explanations and will definitely keep thinking about what you said, but the picture is getting more dense with every bit of information I've gathered.
VAERS shows rebound infections are peaking during week 28 after patients received their second dose and during week 14 after patients received a booster. You can find this in my last article about German mortality.
On top of that, a letter recently published in nejm found very long virus shedding periods for people who suffer a breakthrough infection after being boosted, but not for those who did not receive a booster. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2202092
In my next article I will show that booster doses are leading cases by 3 months and how this relationship is being obfuscated by booster dose reporting delays.
Amazing work! Since booster uptake as well as risk from covid increase disproportionally with age, should (+could) this be controlled for?
It is already controlled for.
Deaths per day and cases per day are affected by population age.
If either of those was our dependent variable, we would have to control for population age.
Our dependent variable is just the 'number of weeks for the first 50% of cases/deaths to occur' though and I cannot see that being affected by population age.
Thank you very much. I will do that. That makes perfect sense since I am aware of the ethymology. It's the same word in German though.
EDIT: Done. Ironically I didn't make this mistake in the article before this one (the one about German excess mortality).
ModRNA vaccines are falsely labelled as mRNA vaccines. In the media, modRNA and mRNA are treated as the same thing.
There are no mRNA vaccines for COVID-19 as far as I know.
I do not care about the legal definition of either word. If modRNA-based vaccines can legally be called mRNA vaccines, the laws are wrong, because chemically these two substance classes are distinct from one another:
- mRNA consists of the same 5 nucleotides present in all naturally occuring DNA/RNA (uridine, adenosine, thymidine, cytidine and guanosine)
- modRNA has uridine replaced with 1-methyl-pseudouridine
There are probably other codon optimizations that are being implemented to achieve whatever the manufacturer considers effectivity.
I'd like to help you and possibly can, but you will have to get the definitions right.
This article shows you the physiological process of gene transcription and protein translation:
https://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/translation-dna-to-mrna-to-protein-393/
This article is about endogenous mRNA:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messenger_RNA
Endogenous substances and processes are those that originate from within a living organism.
And finally, this is an article about (exogenous = coming from outside of the organism) modRNA, which is contained in the vaccines by Biontech and Moderna:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nucleoside-modified_messenger_RNA
The main difference between (endogenous) mRNA and (exogenous) modRNA is their respective half-lives. mRNA has a half life that is estimated to be around 10 hours, while modRNA can be translated for weeks.
No, neither of these is traditional. Both should be considered ATMP's (Advanced Technology Medical Products).
In genetics, the vector is the vehicle that delivers a payload.
Our payload is the spike protein blueprint.
The two technologies you refer to are two different vectors:
Vector 1 is modRNA encapsulated in nanoparticles
Vector 2 is DNA carried by an adenovirus
In the media you will often hear the term "vector-based". This is referring to adenovirus vaccines (like the ones from AstraZeneca and J&J).
Strictly speaking both modRNA-based and adenoviral vaccines are gene therapeutics that use a vector to deliver a payload. One through infection, one through transfection. An adenovirus infection however is a more natural process than the transfection via modRNA nanoparticulate.