USA Preview: Weaponization of Children
US government data confirm modRNA products are causing epidemics
Summary
This is just gonna be a very brief preview, since it will take some more effort to pack this into a comprehensive article that will look at more than just 1 wave. I am far from done with the US data.
The US booster campaign of 12-17 year old children in late Q1 of 2022 allowed BA.2 to gain predominance, causing over 15 million infections.
For every boostered resident aged 12-17 per resident aged 12-17 6.9% (95% CI: 5.9%-7.8%) of a region’s population caught the infection in the 8 weeks starting with calendar week 12 of 2022. Regions with low booster rates among their child population only saw neglible BA.2 case rates at the time.
Preview
Mass imprinting events can be described by three core characteristics:
target population (immune system)
dose series (previous imprinting)
administered products
I looked at case loads and various vaccination rates across US states in the time from calendar weeks 12 through 19 of 2022 in order to understand what kicked off the BA.2 wave of Q2’2022.
I checked cumulative doses per population for the following dose series and age groups and determined the strength of linear correlation:
We can see that the strength of the correlation increases with temporal proximity between vaccination campaign and BA.2 wave. The only dose series which lines up all jurisdictions including Puerto Rico in a very tight channel was the booster series administered to children aged 12-17 beginning in Q4’2021.
Since cases of BA.1 and BA.2 are overlapping here and we are seeing a baseline case rate of 0.25% per 8 weeks, it seems BA.2 would possibly never have been sequenced at all if it weren’t for the boostering of children.
A quick look at the vaccination campaign and the variant data on Our World in Data should confirm this. It is so obvious what is happening here by now, that I only felt the need to do that a minute ago while writing this preview article.
The first sequenced SARS-CoV-2 sample from the USA that was positive for BA.2 is reported for the two weeks preceding Dec 20th according to OWID.
This is just getting darker and darker: COVID-19 vaccine: vaccinate the young to protect the old?
A.G.'s work was funded by UKRI/AHRC grant AH/V006819/1 and by the Wellcome Trust, grant numbers WT104848 and WT203132. J.S.'s work was funded by the Wellcome Trust, grant numbers WT104848 and WT203132. D.W.'s work was funded by the Wellcome Trust, grant number WT203132.
That percentage point in kids apparently translating to a vax resistant variant taking over beautifully illustrates a VandenBossche idea, namely that baby/childhood vaxx translating to the imbeciles hacking away at the little bit of herd immunity there was. In fact, some trustworthy-looking research suggested families with kids in them had less corona due to them forming a natural barrier to it "out of the box". The sinister bit is obviously that they're literally killing young kids. At least the price tag is quite high since they ensure Pfizer's herd immunity to liability across the board (US). I'm just astonished that they've a) just pulled this off haven't they and b) gone from merely offering a good number of partially mentally disabled/autistic/SIDded to the altar of supposed lifelong immunity to this and that disease to maiming and killing their offspring by wrecking their immune sys, without so much as breaking their stride. The net result including, as Fabian appears to hint at here, a net negative impact on the holy grail, the fata morgana of overall herd immunity strictly as per the most recent WHO definition of the latter.
From June until October of 2022, I tracked weekly case rates by Bundesland in Germany. Indeed correlation was highest between case rate and first booster. However, I do not have the data at hand to zoom into the age groups.