Of Missiles and Microbes

Hypnosis, Radiation Exposure and COVID-19

Jul 12, 2025

Introduction

I said I’d talk about my story in “what’s coming next”, but have since decided I won’t - not for some time to come anyway. I think it’s important that we share our personal tragedies for people to realize what we had to go through during that time and why it’s so important that we find means to put an end to the propaganda machine. But I am not equipped to relive those memories right now. I need more time.

Hypnosis

Most of you have long known it: You've been hypnotized — or psychologically manipulated, if you prefer a more clinical term. And not just since 2020. Fine examples of the employed hypnosis techniques can be found among the statements made by Bill Gates in the decade preceding the mass murder event of 2020-2023.

Lowering the world population projections

In what must be his most legendary public appearance safe for his congress hearing on the Netscape matter (where his sociopathic tendencies and complete obliviousness to the concepts of right and wrong became crystal clear), Bill Gates delivered the following prognosis in a 2010 TED talk:

The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent. [1,2]

Many of us interpreted this as a Freudian slip - his subconscious must have been doing the talking for him. A sure sign that Gates intended to reduce the population with vaccines.

It stuck with us for a decade.

And when people began dropping like flies in 2021, the clip resurfaced.

But if what we saw was a Freudian slip, then how do we explain, that Gates delivered that statement with perfect calm?
No nerves. No correction. No stutter — like when he’s asked about sexual encounters with minors (which he just might’ve had a number of back in the hey-days of Lolita Island).
None of that. He just drove it home and moved on.

Consider his statement intentional. Carefully calculated even.
Consider that clip a deliberately planted psychological trigger — a decoy meant to occupy your focus.

I’ve already shown you how Denis Rancourt lied to you. He’s not alone. And by and large they are all telling the same lies.

Ed Dowd. Michael Yeadon. Sasha Latypova. Wolfgang Wodarg. Steve Kirsch. Russ Wolfinger. Children’s Health Defense. RFK Jr. and - in extension - the man behind these last two:
Mark Gorton — a shadowy billionaire whose high-frequency trading firm serves as a liquidity provider to nearly the entire European pharmaceutical industry. And who I admit - not without some pride - happens to have been my own personal handler, too, for the better part of a year.

All of them hammer home the same message:
VACCINES KILLED MILLIONS

But ask yourself:
If every prominent actor in “alternative” discourse pushes the same theory,
and yet their claims remain completely isolated from rigorous scientific discussion,
are you really hearing the truth?

Or are you watching a script unfold?

Because when everyone agrees but nothing changes, you’re likely witnessing controlled opposition — a psy-op designed to drain dissent into a dead-end loop and lull you back to sleep just as you think you’re waking up.

So let’s step outside the psy-op — just for a moment.

Let’s entertain the possibility that vaccines were not the thing killing people,
and that Bill Gates and the pharmaceutical industry are not the entities we should be looking at.

Don’t worry — I still despise the guy and I’m not about to shill for vaccines either.

But I am eventually going to show you something very exciting:

Why it looks like vaccines saved lives
Why that illusion holds up under publicly available data (contrary to Rancourt’s lies)
And how lockdowns along with exclusion of the unvaccinated from the public delayed viral infections - particularly in unvaccinated individuals - just long enough to mask vaccine-associated mortality

I’ve used every opportunity I got to hint at what caused COVID and non-COVID excess deaths alike, but if you haven’t figured it out yourself yet, you’ll need some more patience. In the end - COVID, virology and everything else that didn’t add up will make sense again, so those of you so inclined can proceed towards the experimental phase to see if my hypothesis rings true or not.

“Microbes not missiles”

In a 2015 TED talk, Bill Gates announced:

[...] if anything kills over 10 million people in the next few decades, it’s likely to be a highly infectious virus — rather than a war — not missiles but microbes. [1,2,3,4]

If you follow the links you will find out he is not the first person to use that phrasing. He always knew (and you too will soon know why he and many others always knew) that the events of 2019/20 would be accompanied by the emergence of a novel viral particle. Since viral particles are not microbes the statement is easily identified as a PR-constructed slogan.

If we consider this statement another act of hypnosis and apply the same reasoning we used before, a new working hypothesis emerges:

Missiles caused a pandemic.

What sounds wildly absurd at first becomes as eerily plausible as it is difficult to refute, once you begin to take it literally rather than metaphorically.

I’ll stop here. But before we get to the really exciting part, I’ll leave you with a few tasks — just to keep you moving forward as you work to unravel the COVID puzzle:

Go back to the 1300s and research what the term “influenza (degli astri)” meant back then
Go back to the 1600s and research the original meaning of the word “pandemic” - OR go back 2000 years further and focus the term “epidemic” instead

The Chart Part

I am gonna keep this brief. It is merely a teaser.

What do you know about the impact artificial electromagnetic fields have on our health? Anything?

This image is not proof of any causal link between StarLink and either COVID-19 or excess mortality, so save your breath if you are here to agitate. It is merely an illustration of the timeline. Let it sink in for a week or two.

There is a LOT to be said about the relationship between StarLink, morbidity and mortality patterns - and I promise we will get to that. We are gonna go deep into the pathomechanisms making artificial “non-ionizing radiation” exposure so problematic in terms of the impact it has on both animal and plant life and we are gonna get into the pathophysiology of COVID-19 and what role the novel viral particle SARS-CoV-2 might play in the grand scheme of evolution, which will lead us to the exciting part I mentioned, which is the question:

~~Are Bill and Elon our friends or our foes?~~